Em 19-10-2015 16:26, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
> Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>> Em 19-10-2015 15:28, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
>>> Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>>>> Is this OK?
>>>>
>>>> {{{
>>>> Optional
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> OpenJPEG-2.1.0 (preference is for OpenJPEG1, due to regressions with
>>>> OpenJPEG2)
>>>
>>> I looked at that the other day and the log still says:
>>>
>>>
>>> checking for libjpeg6b... no
>>> checking for libjpeg... -ljpeg
>>> checking jpeglib.h usability... yes
>>> checking jpeglib.h presence... yes
>>> checking for jpeglib.h... yes
>>> checking libjpeg.h works correctly... ok
>>>
>>> use libjpeg: yes
>>> ...
>>> use libopenjpeg: yes
>>> with openjpeg1
>>>
>>> I'm not sure how to interpret that, but it looks like it is saying the
>>> above note may be overcome by events.
>
>> problem is that only openjepeg2 is listed as dependency.
>>
>> What makes sense (not if is the correct one)
>>
>> 1. Both are listed and we we keep the note.
>>
>> 2. Only openjpeg1 is listed, and remove the note?
>>
>> Option 2, I wrote after seen that your log is catching openjpeg1.
>>
>> What seems wrong is listing openjpeg2 only as dependency, with or
>> without a note.
>
> I suppose we could remove OpenJPEG-2, but will poppler try to use it if
> the recommended libjpeg-turpo and OpenJPEG-1 are removed?
>
> When I built poppler, I did not have OpenJPEG-2 installed. I think a
> quick test would be to install OpenJPEG-2 and remove temporarily
> OpenJPEG-1 and then just run the poppler configure and see what it does.
No, no, sorry for the noise.
Only now that you mentioned recommended, I saw that OpenJPEG-1 is listed.
Tired eyes, building the dev system and updating. Please, excuse-me if I
repeat some of those noise, before we are in the regular status.
Thanks for the patience... again.
--
[]s,
Fernando, aka SÃsifo
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
