On Sun, 2016-02-07 at 21:10 +1100, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: > On Sat, 2016-02-06 at 21:04 -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > > Em 06-02-2016 19:38, Ken Moffat escreveu: > > > On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 08:53:40AM +1100, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > The patch command should have -p1 rather than -p0. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Wayne. > > > > > > Hi Wayne, > > > > > > it's an upstream patch created in the top-level directory, it > > > won't > > > apply with -p1. > > > > > > ĸen > > > > > > > Thanks, ĸen. > > > > Sorry for the other post. > > > > Only now I have read yours. > > > > Thanks again. > >
Actually, I've read the ticket. I still don't understand why there are two sources for this patch and why is one better than the other? I notice that Arch is still using http://downloads.sourceforge.net/libp ng-apng/libpng-1.6.21-apng.patch.gz . Wayne. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
