Em 08-02-2016 17:28, Ken Moffat escreveu: > On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 03:27:10PM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> Em 08-02-2016 00:40, William Harrington escreveu: >>> On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 02:17:25 +0000 >>> Ken Moffat <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I'm trying to build libpwquality, for whichever part of kde5 now >>>> requires it. I noted that we have PAM and Cracklib as >>>> "Recommended". >>> >>> Fedora has a patch which is supposed to make it optional, as far as I can >>> tell. >>> >>> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[email protected]/thread/7QJQZCJYNFTX3BQ2UILGQQUBIOTJXAAL/ >>> >>> Could make it required or optional with the patch if it is valid. >>> >>> Sincerely, >>> >>> William Harrington >>> >> >> My preference is recommended, if possible. But agree with Ken's decision >> if he still wishes to promote to required >> > My rational is that Recommended either means > > (i.) The package can build without this, and without extra configure > switches, but the recommended package provides useful extra > functionality (is that a word ?) > > or > > (ii.) The package can be built without this, but you need to supply > extra configure switches. > > This package, as shipped, matches neither option. I am reluctant to > include a patch in the book just so that people can detune what > upstream shipped.
Agreed! -- []s, Fernando, aka SÃsifo -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
