Em 11-02-2016 23:01, Ken Moffat escreveu: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 09:15:17AM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> Em 10-02-2016 14:06, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: >>> Em 10-02-2016 13:20, Ken Moffat escreveu: >>>> On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 07:49:09AM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >>>>> Em 07-02-2016 07:45, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: >>>>>> Em 06-02-2016 22:37, Ken Moffat escreveu: >>>>>>> In my current build, libreoffice failed with: >>>>>>> >>>> [...] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Error: a unit test failed, please do one of: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> export DEBUGCPPUNIT=TRUE # for exception catching >>>>>>> export CPPUNITTRACE="gdb --args" # for interactive debugging on Linux >>>>>>> export VALGRIND=memcheck # for memory checking >>>>>>> >>>>>>> and retry using: make CppunitTest_dbaccess_firebird_test >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> ĸen >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> There has been problems when building in ssh or chroot. I had it a >>>>>> couple of times. e.g. >>>>>> >>>>>> <http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-support/2014-October/075800.html> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Found another one, where I intentionally reproduced the problem via ssh: >>>>> >>>>> <http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-dev/2014-October/028718.html> >>>>> >>>> So, do you think we should add --disable-firebird-sdbc to the >>>> configure ('the firebird support sometimes fails its unit test'), or >>>> else docment it as an optional switch ? >>>> >>>> I see you have taken the next release of LO. >>>> >>>> ĸen >>>> >>> >>> If it fails for me, we add. If not, I will (kindly) ask you to add it to >>> page, it is worth documenting. >> >> No error with Firebired. Please, add your words to document the >> CppunitTest_dbaccess_firebird_failed test. >>> >>> I am building with system boost. The patch failed to apply, mostly for >>> "gave already been applied". If correct, we will all be happy. :-) >> >> Worked fine with system-boost and no patch. >> > Sorry, I got distracted - first I tried to use my new kvm switch, > only to find that my old server does not talk to a usb keyboard, and > then somebody reported a problem with our (my) texlive instructions > on the tl-build list of all places (for the moment, I have indicated > what I think he did wrong). > > Added, as an option, at r16950. For the moment I do not know how > reliably it occurs, and next time I might build gdb anyway (if I > remember). > > ĸen >
Thanks!!! -- []s, Fernando, aka Sísifo -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
