On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 04:38:31AM +0200, Tim Tassonis wrote:
>
>
> On June 20, 2016 2:55:50 AM Ken Moffat <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I've raised #7977 for this. And like Pierre I've no real idea how
> > to approach this - unfortunately, a quick look suggests that no
> > distros are using qupzilla-2 with gcc-6.
>
> Looks a lot like gcc 6 is a pile of crap, having traded stabilty in favour
> of benchmark competitivity with llvm/clang.
>
In this case, I think your denigration is misplaced - the probem is
mostly (i.e. in c++) with code which used to be acceptable but which
now does not accord with the new standards for what is, or is not,
valid.
ĸen
--
War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
