> From: DJ Lucas <d...@linuxfromscratch.org> > Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 23:37:29 -0600 > Subject: [blfs-dev] nosym branches > > Howdy all. You might have noticed the nosym branches in SVN. This > removes the /usr/lib64 symlink and replaces the /lib64 symlink with a > directory containing only the symlinks to the dynamic loader for x86_64. > The changes are actually pretty minimal, excluding the change to > t-linux64 in the gcc builds and all of the removed changes to ltmain.sh > (..lib/whatever.la has been moved), there are changes to eight packages > in BLFS and one in LFS (where libdir must be specified). AFAICT, those > nine changes should have no effect on builds where GCC is not modified. > Although it's already been tested pretty thoroughly, I'd appreciate just > a tad of wider testing before the changes land in trunk. If you've > already built from the patches that have been floating around in my home > directory over the past few months, then you are already up to date with > the branches. >
Link to patches? Are you 'scripting'/parametrising all of the stuff according to 'bitness' (32-bit or 64-bit) &/or whether user wants to do such a thing: or are you just hard-wiring without regard for either parameter. rgds, akh -- -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
