Message: 2
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 00:11:19 +0100
From: Ken Moffat <[email protected]>
To: BLFS Development List <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] blfs 8.3 systemd question dbus-1/system.d is
in both /etc and /usr/share, how to install "blueman"?
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 03:00:31PM -0700, Mark Wigzell via blfs-dev wrote:
> Hey guys, I know I had to install dbus-1 twice, once during LFS, and then
> later for BLFS.
> QUESTION 1:
> So I have a dbus-1 folder in two places as stated above, and system.d is
in
> both! Is this normal, or did I misconfigure?
>
I don't use systemd, but AFAICS both LFS-systemd and BLFS-systemd
install in /usr. What are these two directories to which you refer ?
Hi the two directories are as ini my subject line above:
/etc/dbus-1/system.d and /usr/share/sbus-1/system.d
The configure instructions for "dbus" in 8.3 systemd were:
./configure --prefix=/usr \
--sysconfdir=/etc \
--localstatedir=/var \
--enable-user-session \
--disable-doxygen-docs \
--disable-xml-docs \
--disable-static \
--docdir=/usr/share/doc/dbus-1.12.10 \
--with-console-auth-dir=/run/console \
--with-system-pid-file=/run/dbus/pid \
--with-system-socket=/run/dbus/system_bus_socket
so I note that --sysconfidr=/etc was applied.
On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 12:01 PM <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Send blfs-dev mailing list submissions to
> [email protected]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> [email protected]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> [email protected]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of blfs-dev digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. blfs 8.3 systemd question dbus-1/system.d is in both /etc and
> /usr/share, how to install "blueman"? (Mark Wigzell)
> 2. Re: blfs 8.3 systemd question dbus-1/system.d is in both /etc
> and /usr/share, how to install "blueman"? (Ken Moffat)
> 3. Re: blfs 8.3 systemd question dbus-1/system.d is in both /etc
> and /usr/share, how to install "blueman"? (Ken Moffat)
> 4. openssh patch not on server (Roger Koehler)
> 5. Re: openssh patch not on server (Roger Koehler)
> 6. Linux-PAM-1.31-docs.tar.bz2 (Roger Koehler)
> 7. Re: Linux-PAM-1.31-docs.tar.bz2 (Bruce Dubbs)
> 8. sound-theme-freedesktop md5sum (Pierre Labastie)
> 9. Re: sound-theme-freedesktop md5sum (Bruce Dubbs)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 15:00:31 -0700
> From: Mark Wigzell <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [blfs-dev] blfs 8.3 systemd question dbus-1/system.d is in
> both /etc and /usr/share, how to install "blueman"?
> Message-ID:
> <
> ca+a9a7apxrwdhcjnzwnkhh-m56vjt9uwzgvcxj7wp_yfmsj...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hey guys, I know I had to install dbus-1 twice, once during LFS, and then
> later for BLFS.
> QUESTION 1:
> So I have a dbus-1 folder in two places as stated above, and system.d is in
> both! Is this normal, or did I misconfigure?
>
> QUESTION 2:
> I am actually trying to install "blueman" which is not part of BLFS
> anymore, but I seem to need something like it for my LXDE desktop.
> I'm having the devil of a time trying to understand where to launch a dbus
> session in which to start "blueman-applet". It seems that the inherited
> shell variable DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS is no good for "blueman-applet"
> which complains if I don't start my own dbus session with export eval
> `dbus-launch` first.
> Any idea about what may be wrong? I can manually start "blueman-applet" if
> I have previously started a local dbus session, so I'm almost there, but
> how do I "embed" this manual solution properly into my dbus-1/systemd
> configuration?
>
> Any help appreciated!
> Regards,
> --Mark
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-dev/attachments/20190421/eb9d1776/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 00:11:19 +0100
> From: Ken Moffat <[email protected]>
> To: BLFS Development List <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] blfs 8.3 systemd question dbus-1/system.d is
> in both /etc and /usr/share, how to install "blueman"?
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 03:00:31PM -0700, Mark Wigzell via blfs-dev wrote:
> > Hey guys, I know I had to install dbus-1 twice, once during LFS, and then
> > later for BLFS.
> > QUESTION 1:
> > So I have a dbus-1 folder in two places as stated above, and system.d is
> in
> > both! Is this normal, or did I misconfigure?
> >
> I don't use systemd, but AFAICS both LFS-systemd and BLFS-systemd
> install in /usr. What are these two directories to which you refer ?
>
> > QUESTION 2:
> > I am actually trying to install "blueman" which is not part of BLFS
> > anymore, but I seem to need something like it for my LXDE desktop.
> > I'm having the devil of a time trying to understand where to launch a
> dbus
> > session in which to start "blueman-applet". It seems that the inherited
> > shell variable DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS is no good for "blueman-applet"
> > which complains if I don't start my own dbus session with export eval
> > `dbus-launch` first.
> > Any idea about what may be wrong? I can manually start "blueman-applet"
> if
> > I have previously started a local dbus session, so I'm almost there, but
> > how do I "embed" this manual solution properly into my dbus-1/systemd
> > configuration?
> >
> Looking at my (old) files, I think you need to invoke dbus-launch if
> the WM/DE doesn't already do that. Your comments suggest that your
> lxde system doesn't do that, so it really ought to be in whatever
> gets read (.xinitrc for startx, typically .xsession for graphical
> logins). In the past, I've symlinked .xinitrc as .xsession so that
> I could use graphical logins, but I've long-since stopped using
> graphical logins.
>
> ĸen
> --
> It is said that there are two great unsolved problems in computer
> science: naming, cache invalidation, and off-by-one errors.
> -- Ben Bullock
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 00:27:52 +0100
> From: Ken Moffat <[email protected]>
> To: BLFS Development List <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] blfs 8.3 systemd question dbus-1/system.d is
> in both /etc and /usr/share, how to install "blueman"?
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 12:11:19AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 03:00:31PM -0700, Mark Wigzell via blfs-dev
> wrote:
> > > Hey guys, I know I had to install dbus-1 twice, once during LFS, and
> then
> > > later for BLFS.
> > > QUESTION 1:
> > > So I have a dbus-1 folder in two places as stated above, and system.d
> is in
> > > both! Is this normal, or did I misconfigure?
> > >
> > I don't use systemd, but AFAICS both LFS-systemd and BLFS-systemd
> > install in /usr. What are these two directories to which you refer ?
> >
> I now see that you put it in $SUBJECT (I cannot see that when
> replying). The /etc/dbus-1/system.d directory on my sysvinit build
> contains conf files, /usr/share/dbus-1/system.d/ on this system
> contains one other (from ColorManager). I doubt that the particular
> directory used for a conf file is important.
>
> I also see that this is about an 8.3 system - yes, installing BLFS
> takes time, but the place for asking questions is usually
> blfs-support. We all do ask questions here about things which might
> better be asked on blfs-support, but you are more likely to find
> knowledgeable people for this sort of question on that list.
>
> Here, we're more interested in things which break, or which we
> broke, in the development book, and topics such as getting rid of
> python2 (hint: that is not yet recommended if you want a graphical
> browser other than 'links -g').
>
> I'll now go back to updating some old systems which I try to keep
> usable, for the latest vulnerabilities (qtwebengine in this case) -
> I mention that to point out that by now there is a *lot* of outdated
> stuff in BLFS-8.3.
>
> ĸen
> --
> It is said that there are two great unsolved problems in computer
> science: naming, cache invalidation, and off-by-one errors.
> -- Ben Bullock
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 05:11:11 -0600
> From: Roger Koehler <[email protected]>
> To: BLFS Development List <[email protected]>
> Subject: [blfs-dev] openssh patch not on server
> Message-ID:
> <
> caayr32euoe6ozqy07g5ieg0905ypwhvkkym3gcbmgovkxcf...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
>
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/blfs/svn/openssh-8.0p1-security_fix-1.patch
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-dev/attachments/20190422/530c8a63/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 05:14:27 -0600
> From: Roger Koehler <[email protected]>
> To: BLFS Development List <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] openssh patch not on server
> Message-ID:
> <CAAYR32EdVgk5QBp3JEzg8Ofny6V8XU-UxnHBLr=
> [email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 5:11 AM Roger Koehler <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/blfs/svn/openssh-8.0p1-security_fix-1.patch
>
> Sorry. I just noticed that this patch is no longer in the book.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 05:30:50 -0600
> From: Roger Koehler <[email protected]>
> To: BLFS Development List <[email protected]>
> Subject: [blfs-dev] Linux-PAM-1.31-docs.tar.bz2
> Message-ID:
> <
> caayr32gd6w9yrvbebop-oxtq4wujzxkdnsnfpgdojcfoaue...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> It looks like they changed to xz:
>
>
> https://github.com/linux-pam/linux-pam/releases/download/v1.3.1/Linux-PAM-1.3.1-docs.tar.xz
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 07:50:26 -0500
> From: Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Linux-PAM-1.31-docs.tar.bz2
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>
> On 4/22/19 6:30 AM, Roger Koehler via blfs-dev wrote:
> > It looks like they changed to xz:
> >
> >
> https://github.com/linux-pam/linux-pam/releases/download/v1.3.1/Linux-PAM-1.3.1-docs.tar.xz
>
> They did. I thought I fixed that, but missed the docs. Fixed.
>
> -- Bruce
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 19:36:01 +0200
> From: Pierre Labastie <[email protected]>
> To: BLFS Development List <[email protected]>
> Subject: [blfs-dev] sound-theme-freedesktop md5sum
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> There is a discrepancy between the md5sum in the book and the md5sum of the
> downloaded file. Since the file has not changed for 7 years, I believed it
> was
> a stealth update, but files downloaded from the primary site, osuosl, or
> lfs-matrix all have the same md5sum.
>
> Is it possible that md5sum has been wrong since the beginning and nobody
> noticed?
>
> Pierre
> (I'll update the book)
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 13:23:05 -0500
> From: Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] sound-theme-freedesktop md5sum
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>
> On 4/22/19 12:36 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
> > There is a discrepancy between the md5sum in the book and the md5sum of
> the
> > downloaded file. Since the file has not changed for 7 years, I believed
> it was
> > a stealth update, but files downloaded from the primary site, osuosl, or
> > lfs-matrix all have the same md5sum.
> >
> > Is it possible that md5sum has been wrong since the beginning and nobody
> noticed?
>
> Somewhere along the line it got changed in the book. I check the sum
> against the book when I put the files on osuosl. Thanks for noticing.
>
> -- Bruce
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> --
> http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of blfs-dev Digest, Vol 1347, Issue 1
> *****************************************
>
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
