On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 03:33:54PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
> On 8/14/19 3:23 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
> > Now that we have gone with the fix which upstream glibc are using re
> > the linux-5.2 headers changes, should we not just extirpate the
> > SIOCGSTAMP seds and archive the xinclude member I set up to explain
> > them ?
> >
> > There are references in:
> >
> > xincludes/SIOCGSTAMP.xml
> > x/lib/qtwebengine.xml (commented)
> > x/lib/qt5.xml (active)
> > general/sysutils/bluez.xml (commented)
> > xsoft/graphweb/firefox.xml (active, and pulls in the xinclude)
>
> Lets comment qt5 and firefox. We can leave the xinclude for now. It we
> don't use it, there is no harm in leaving it in the xinclude directory.
Done, r21958.
--
Adopted by dwarfs, brought up by dwarfs. To dwarfs I'm a dwarf, sir.
I can do the rite of k'zakra, I know the secrets of h'ragna, I can
ha'lk my g'rakha correctly ... I am a dwarf
Captain Carrot Ironfoundersson (in The Fifth Elephant)
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
