On Sun, 2021-03-28 at 18:42 +0100, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 04:16:33PM +0100, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > > In theory plugins should have been working for years, and nothing in > > that area has changed, but exceot for icewm I don't use lto because > > packages that should benefit from the longer build (mozilla > > packages) get rebuilt monthly and the extra build time seems a > > waste. > > Looks as if my script broke at some point in the past: > liblto_plugin.so points to > /usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu//liblto_plugin.so > which of course does not exist. > > So I get to keep both the pieces ;-) Thanks for the diagnostics, > they do not alter my views about unnecessarily using cmake, but I > guess I'm in a minority on that.
While doing research about that problem, I found one of the issues where the reporter was having a problem during build, and was using autotools. The maintainer advised him to use cmake, so it seems to be upstream choice. Pierre -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
