Richard A Downing escribió:
I use OpenBox3, possibly the most minimalist WM that uses XML for it's
configuration files. Then I add PyPanel for the 'where the hell is that
app I started a few hours ago?' feeling. I use mrxvt instead of xterm
for the tabbed virtual screens.
I like OpenBox3's menus, although you need a good XML editor to
construct and edit them - they have a nice obstruse syntax. I use
coreutils (ls,mv,cp,etc..) as my file manager.
I try KDE and Gnome occasionally, but they are just too huge, and I
don't like the look&feel of either. Why do they need so many background
processes? X's cut&paste works as well as their drag&drop for me.
UNIX's great step forward was the ability to string simple applications
together to do complex useful things - Windows, Gnome and KDE seem to
promote the monolithic applications.
R.
¿Anyone likes the venerable Motif?
It's clean, simple, robust, pretty (for me, of course), and at last,
it's free (http:// www.openmotif.org).
Un saludo.
J.C.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
