Hi

I recall that previous versions of BLFS or LFS (or maybe both) recommended
installing gcc-2.3.5 in addition to gcc3. I think there were a few packages
that didn't compile with gcc3, but did with gcc-2.3.5 (and I think that was
the recommended gcc for Linux 2.4). Now that gcc4 is out (and will be in the
next LFS stable release), I'm wondering--is it necessary (or a good idea,
even) to keep a copy of some gcc3 version. What about gcc2--is it necessary
to keep that (assuming we're Linux 2.6)?

Thanks
Brandin Creech



        
                
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to