Ken Moffat wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Brandin Creech wrote:
I'm tempted to go with 6.9.0, since I am under the impression that it is
identical to 7.0.0 except for the fact that 7.0.0 is modular (and thus,
presumably more difficult to compile). I was wondering if there are any
compatibility problems that I should expect with 6.9.0 or 7.0.0, and
which
one do people recommend in the interest of easy upgrades?
For ease of upgrade, 6.9 - same instructions as 6.8, but no gcc-4
patches. The only difference in building is that you shoud add '#define
BuildXterm YES' to host.def if you want to use xterms.
Dont' forget the broken kd.h file (from llh).
The path will be different, but the sed is the same:
sed -i "[EMAIL PROTECTED]/@*/\n#include <linux/types.h>\n@" \
hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/lnx_agp.c
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
