On Thursday 23 March 2006 09:36, Simon Geard wrote: > On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 06:25 -0600, Randy McMurchy wrote: > > You can't expect the developers to compare their software against > > what other software does. We can only expect that the developers > > adequately document what their software does, and how to use it. And > > in this case, I believe they do. > > Well, to be fair, they document what their software does in terms that > make sense to someone who needs to use their software, i.e other > developers. > That's what I found. Quite some time ago, someone here tried to remove libtool and all the .la files from their system. I went to the libtool homepage to see what it did and why anyone would want to remove it. After reading for ages, I left that page with a massive headache and no clue about what they were talking about (-;
> That's how it should be since those are the people it's targeted at, but > it's hard to appreciate what something like libtool does if you've never > struggled with making something portable between, say, Linux, AIX, HP-UX > and Windows. > Whereas Simon's explanation was quick, consice and to the point. Kinda like the difference between reading a Master's level Text on Quantum Mechanics, or Stephen Hawkings, 'A Brief History of Time'. They both describe the same thing, but the latter is understandable by mere mortals like me (-; I'm sure developers understand the documentation provided, but us mere builders need the 'Brief History' version (-; Cheers, John Gay -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page