On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 10:47:23PM -0600, Randy McMurchy wrote: > > It simply isn't that hard to determine what "required patch" means.
It is simply a matter of perspective. Technically, the patch isn't a gcc-3 patch, but rather a C standard compliance patch. I also agree the patch should be renamed to reflect its new purpose (i.e. fix compile errors with gcc-4) if for no other reason that mention of gcc3 will cause some confusion and support questions. The book has had errors in patch names before and this could easily be thought to be one of them by many. -- Archaic Want control, education, and security from your operating system? Hardened Linux From Scratch http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
