On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 23:53 -0600, Peter B. Steiger wrote: > Nope, I'm still sticking with gcc 3.x until 4.x no longer requires > patching the source (of target applications) to build stuff.
It's been long enough now that if a program is going to be updated, it has been by now - anything that still doesn't compile with gcc4 is probably unmaintained. In my case glib 1.2 and cdparanoia are the only packages affected - the former being an obsolete but still used version, and the latter hasn't made a new release in years. Simon.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
