On Tuesday 13 June 2006 13:03, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> If pmount wants to use libsysfs, then it wants to use libsysfs.


yep,  But does libsysfs conflict with Udev-0.9*(?)  I think Udev-0.9* has its 
own cut down version of libsysfs.
 
>
> Well, there's no such thing as gnome-mount-3.0.  However,
> gnome-mount-0.4 does not need libsysfs.  

Oops, I was meant to write gnome-mount-0.3

> And if you plan on using 
> Gnome as your main desktop, gnome-vfs, gnome-volume-manager and
> possibly nautilus all attempt to use gnome-mount before falling back
> to their own mounting methods.
>
> --
> Dan

Cool

I've asked this question because of two trial and error tests, with the 
following results... 

Try 1: 
After installing Gnome-2.14.2 using Udev-0.92 Hal-0.5.7 and Dbus-0.61(but 
without pmount and libsysfs), I found that all the devices mounted would (or 
could) automatically start/mount their respective applications/programs.

But for some resion I had device group permission issues to be seen too first.  
I don't have Linux-PAM installed, if that fixes the problem(?).  (I did 
install gnome-mount-0.3 afterwards too by the way).



Try 2:
But after installing (yet again) Gnome-2.14.2 using Udev-0.92 Hal-0.5.7 and 
Dbus-0.61 with pmount and libsysfs, I found that the devices needed to be 
manually mounted before their respective applications/programs would start.  
(I didn't install gnome-mount-0.3 this time around).  

I did not have any device permission issues this time around.  And I think 
that is what pmount is used for(?)  A mounting wrapper for Correcting or 
ignoring device group permissions(?)


Has any one had this sort of problem, or is it just me having bad luck?


Thanks

Dave
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to