On Tuesday 13 June 2006 13:03, Dan Nicholson wrote: > If pmount wants to use libsysfs, then it wants to use libsysfs.
yep, But does libsysfs conflict with Udev-0.9*(?) I think Udev-0.9* has its own cut down version of libsysfs. > > Well, there's no such thing as gnome-mount-3.0. However, > gnome-mount-0.4 does not need libsysfs. Oops, I was meant to write gnome-mount-0.3 > And if you plan on using > Gnome as your main desktop, gnome-vfs, gnome-volume-manager and > possibly nautilus all attempt to use gnome-mount before falling back > to their own mounting methods. > > -- > Dan Cool I've asked this question because of two trial and error tests, with the following results... Try 1: After installing Gnome-2.14.2 using Udev-0.92 Hal-0.5.7 and Dbus-0.61(but without pmount and libsysfs), I found that all the devices mounted would (or could) automatically start/mount their respective applications/programs. But for some resion I had device group permission issues to be seen too first. I don't have Linux-PAM installed, if that fixes the problem(?). (I did install gnome-mount-0.3 afterwards too by the way). Try 2: But after installing (yet again) Gnome-2.14.2 using Udev-0.92 Hal-0.5.7 and Dbus-0.61 with pmount and libsysfs, I found that the devices needed to be manually mounted before their respective applications/programs would start. (I didn't install gnome-mount-0.3 this time around). I did not have any device permission issues this time around. And I think that is what pmount is used for(?) A mounting wrapper for Correcting or ignoring device group permissions(?) Has any one had this sort of problem, or is it just me having bad luck? Thanks Dave -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page