Today on „¡Mythbusters!", Dan Nicholson wrote: > > Sounds like you found the terminal you want, but I just wanted to > dispell the above myth. In my experience, gtk2 will respect the compose > button I put in xorg.conf (no AltGr for me). For instance, I sometimes > have to write Jürg in these emails, and I just did it using my compose > key that I map with this in xorg.conf: > > Section "InputDevice" > Identifier "MS Keyboard" > Driver "kbd" > Option "XkbRules" "xorg" > Option "XkbModel" "pc105" > Option "XkbLayout" "us" > Option "XkbOptions" "compose:ralt" > EndSection >
Wow! You da man! In my case, "compose:rmenu" because AltGr is far too important for me to relegate to Compose, and my current keyboard has a 'menu' key next to it, where they used to put 'right windows' (:rwin if you have that). I'm still having difficulty with some of the symbols, but the technique definitely works and I can now type all the Welsh characters I desire. > Gtk2 also provides a neat utility if you know the Unicode value of the > character. Control + Shift + <code>. For instance, ü is Control + Shift > + <fc>. > Useful, but never hit any leading zero doing this unless you like a spurious '(' in front of the symbol. Works in abiword, but only if the font supports the glyph (Charis-SIL has just gone down in my estimation). So, consider the 'Gtk2-doesn't-respect-Compose' myth set to rights. Thanks! ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page