On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:39:19PM +0000, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 08:43:39PM +0000, b-vol wrote: > > > #####then the not so good tidings: > > Ont the same AMD-64 (64-bit build gcc-4.3.2) udf-tools-1.0.0b3 dos not > > compile. I get the following compiler spew:- > > > > cdrwtool.c: In function 'cdrom_open_check': > > cdrwtool.c:606: error: 'INT_MAX' undeclared (first use in this function) > > cdrwtool.c:606: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > > cdrwtool.c:606: error: for each function it appears in.) > > I've seen that elsewhere, I think (checks notes ...) - also applies > to dvd+rw-tools, add '#include <limits.h>' to that file (the > userspace side of cdrom.h changed in 2.6.23). Oh, that's another > "appears to no longer be maintained" package. We seem to have an > awful lot of them in BLFS. > For my sins, I was doing the "need patches" ticket, so I thought I'd have a go at udf-tools, but it's just one file after another. I've created ticket #2690 - I don't actually care about this package, so at the moment I'll be happy if it is put out of its misery and droped. (phrased that way because you never know, another dependency might drag it in).
In the meantime, I recommend anyone who needs it to apply _all_ the patches / seds / whatever from a distro, and _only_ those changes. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
