Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 16:05:44 -0600
From: Bruce Dubbs <bruce.du...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: no libjpeg.so.62
To: BLFS Support List <blfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org>
Message-ID: <4d697938.1030...@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>Dale Stein wrote:
>> To All.
>> Just finished building for the most part kde-4.6.0 and was trying to
>> install blender beta binary. It complained that it could not find
>> libjpeg.so.62 so upon some googling found
>> that it does not install without a doing make install lib after make
install .
>Umm, no. ibjpeg.so.62 is the old jpeg-6b library. The current library
>is libjpeg.so.8.0.2. If you really need the old version, you can either
>download and build jpegsrc.v6b.tar.gz or try a sym link to
libjpeg.so.8.0.2.
-- Bruce
Sorry, I was called to "work" after my last post and actually thought there
would be no comments concering this issue. But a few nights ago I
did download the old version and installed it in /opt/jpg7 then added it to
ld.config.so so the binary install would see it. It did and the install
went
gread, only it complained about alsa. Well I am still working on that.
Also,
the binary is using a internal version of Python3 which I do not have
installed.
The binary install was just to see the program, and it is very nice, but am
not
going to be using it for anything.
Thanks,
--
Dale Stein
--
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 16:20:52 -0600
From: William Immendorf <will.immend...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: no libjpeg.so.62
To: BLFS Support List <blfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org>
Message-ID:
<aanlktik9zktrfaxnghqjzf2p2aqpgmqtpqjfym__b...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Dale Stein <dstein2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Sorry for the post,
>> make install lib did not work.
>> libjpeg.so.62 still cannot be found.
>Firstly, please don't top post, no matter how much you client wants
>you to do that. Put your reply at the bottom of the message you are
>replying to, and be sure to trim messages.
>Anyway, I told you to use the source release of Blender and not the
>binary one that uses libjpeg-6b. Either use that or follow Bruce's
>advice. but I'd advise you to use the source release first.
>While on the subject of JPEG, there is a fork of libjpeg out there
>called libjpeg-turbo. By using SMID instructions (like MMX and SSE2)
>to accelerate baseline JPEG compression and decompression on x86 (32
>and 64-bit) systems. With the acceleration, it is 2x-4x times as fast
>as the unmodified version of libjpeg. If it's added to the book, the
>only modification is to add NASM as a recommended dep (to get the
>accelerated routines),
>It's web site is at: http://libjpeg-turbo.virtualgl.org/--
>William Immendorf
As above, I did the old libjpeg install and that did work great, but I had
to
try libjpeg-turbo. I installed it in /usr and linked libjpeg.so.64 to it.
Then installed beender binary again. It worked but can't attest to
how well new library is working. I am going to uninstall blender though,
it appears very in depth, professional and actually may be the best linux
application program I have seen thus far, except for OO and gimp. There
may be others, but it is right up there. I did try the source build and
Python does stop the build. A quick attempt at Python3.0 did not work
either. So for now, I have to leave it for another day.
I am going to leave jpeg-turbo installed, It may be very handy indeed.
--
Dale Stein
I will leave it for another day.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
