On 19/11/11 02:02, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > --- Em sex, 18/11/11, Wayne Blaszczyk <wblas...@bigpond.net.au> escreveu: ... >> Can >> some please post the md5sum for Linux-PAM-1.1.4.tar.bz2. I >> just want to >> make sure I've downloaded the correct version. >> Thanks, >> Wayne > > > > wget -c > http://ftp.df.lth.se/pub/linux/libs/pam/documentation/Linux-PAM-1.1.4-docs.tar.bz2.sign > && > wget -c > http://ftp.df.lth.se/pub/linux/libs/pam/documentation/Linux-PAM-1.1.4-docs.tar.bz2 > && > wget -c > http://ftp.df.lth.se/pub/linux/libs/pam/library/Linux-PAM-1.1.4.tar.bz2.sign > && > wget -c > http://ftp.df.lth.se/pub/linux/libs/pam/library/Linux-PAM-1.1.4.tar.bz2 && > gpg --verify Linux-PAM-1.1.4-docs.tar.bz2.sign Linux-PAM-1.1.4-docs.tar.bz2 && > gpg --verify Linux-PAM-1.1.4.tar.bz2.sign Linux-PAM-1.1.4.tar.bz2 > > > []s, > Fernando de Oliveira > Natal, RN, BRAZIL
Thanks, the reason why I asked for the md5sums was that I'm not familar with this sign concept. When I run the verify command,I get the following warning message: gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Should there be concern with this? This is after doing the following command: gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 0x517D0F0E Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
