DJ Lucas wrote: > On 11/19/2011 02:51 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >>> I do not know to which list should I address this. >>> >>> I am having a little trouble with the messages, now that I am trying >>> to follow more than one *lfs* list. Worse, when the same message is a >>> notification simultaneously sent to more than one list. >>> >>> I would like to suggest, to the maintainers (Bruce?, Ken?), >>> including, if possible and not very difficult, an automatic >>> identification in the subject, such as in this message >>> [blfs-support], or [BLFS Support], when distributing it to the list. >> I'll take a look and see what I can do, but I've had filters for years >> on the Reply-To: address. That is: >> >> BLFS Support List<blfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org> >> LFS Support List<lfs-supp...@linuxfromscratch.org> >> >> etc. >> >> -- Bruce > > I've always filtered on "return-path" for LFS list emails. I do not now > recall the reason for that over "reply-to".
For my client (seamonkey), the Reply-to: is visible. Return-Path: is not. Besides the return path is <blfs-support-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org> which is slightly confusing. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
