On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 02:28:13PM -0600, rhubarbpie...@gmail.com wrote: > > It was suggested I apply "sed -i -e /DRI_DIRS=\"i915/s/nouveau//' > configure" when compiling Mesa. Should that be "sed -i -e > '/DRI_DIRS=/"i915/s/nouveau//' configure"? The suggested sed bombs. > Unfortunately, my thought executes, but doesn't solve the problem.
Yes, sorry about the missing single quote. > > I've tried compiling libdrm with "--enable-nouveau-experimental-api" and > "./configure --prefix=$XORG_PREFIX --build=x86 > --enable-nouveau-experimental-api" without success. That seems to be > working for others, what else might I be doing wrong? > > Again, I can successfully compile X without dri and glx, but Mesa/dri > is giving me problems. > I've just compiled and done a DESTDIR install of libdrm-2.4.27 (on x86_64) using ./configure --prefix=/usr --enable-nouveau-experimental-api At the end of configure it told me: libdrm 2.4.27 will be compiled with: libkms yes Intel API yes vmwgfx API no Radeon API yes Nouveau API yes and it then installed libdrm_nouveau.so.1.0.0 and libdrm_nouveau.pc (which has a version of 0.6). The test in MesaLib's configure is $PKG_CONFIG --exists --print-errors "libdrm_nouveau >= $LIBDRM_NOUVEAU_REQUIRED" where LIBDRM_NOUVEAU_REQUIRED is 0.6. So, it *ought* to work - unless you had a typo in the command, or failed to install the rebuilt libdrm, or are using different prefixes, or are doing something else different. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
