Armin K. wrote: > On 11.09.2012 17:18, Armin K. wrote: >> On 11.09.2012 16:10, John Burrell wrote: >>> Bruce - >>> >>> Thanks for removing the \ in the mysql commands. Much better now. >>> >>> One last tiny request. The names of patches have a convention - >>> >>> the source name and version followed by some descriptor .patch >>> >>> I think all the LFS and BLFS patches conform to this - except one (that >>> I've found, anyway) >>> >>> webkitgtk >>> >>> The source is webkit but the patch is named webkitgtk. >>> >>> I wonder if you would change it please. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> jb. >>> >>> >> >> That's not up to me. I think that Bruce's script looks up patches by >> package name, not package tarball ... >> > > See here: > > http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/patches/2012-March/003900.html > > Patch was named webkit ... blah blah > > But script didn't find it: > > http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-book/2012-March/031705.html > > It was looking for webkitgtk patch.
The bad file name then was webkitgtk-1.6.1_gcc-4.7-1.patch The script just matches up the name in the book with the file in the repository. As long as they match, it's ok. That said, I don't have a problem with a name of webkit-1.6.1-bison-1.patch Generally, the naming is tarball_stem dash tarball_version dash descriptor (without dashes) dash patch_version (usually 1) dot patch. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
