On Fri, 2013-01-04 at 23:10 +0100, Armin K. wrote: > One example is libffi 3.0.10 to 3.0.11 upgrade, where libffi.so.5 became > libffi.so.6 and everything that used libffi was required to be rebuilt.
Seriously? They bumped the ABI version in a 0.0.1 release increment? That's a shocker... Simon.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
