On 1.2.2014 1:52, alex lupu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I prefer to stay with video-intel 2.99.907 (as opposed to 2.21.15)
> for the time being:
>
> 1.  Being released subsequent to server 1.15.0, it compiles "naturally"
> on it.
> (otherwise the intel developer would be tarred and feathered and run
>   out of town on a rail)
>
> 2.  It should contain some other goodies (besides the buildt-in "patch"
> logic)
> the developer came up with over the four months of hard work.
>

Lot of sna work, no doubt, including the TearFree option. Also, addition 
of intel-virtual-output tool, intel broadwell support and some minor 
fixes unrelated to anything mentioned.

http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-intel/log/

repository is public

> Actually, that's neither here nor there (different folks, different
> strokes).
> The problem is my server (1.15.0) crashes if
>   Option  "AccelMethod" "glamor", as in the book.
>   (whether using 2.21.15 or 2.99.907 (without the patch, of course:))
> However. comes up perfectly with
>   Option  "AccelMethod" "glamoregl"
>

Unrelated to this, but fyi sna is superior to glamor acceleration. You 
might get better preformance when using sna, which is now the default 
one without the --with-default-accel switch.

> Reference: BLFS Development Book 2014-01-29
>              xf86-video-intel 2.21.15    21-Aug-2013
>              xorg-server 1.15.0          27-Dec-2013
>              xf86-video-intel 2.99.907   30-Dec-2013
>
> Cheers,
> -- Alex
>
>
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to