> Your distro, your rules. Just don't expect a lot of excitement from > others when you customize.
The book says: "Should I install XXX in /usr or /usr/local? This is a question without an obvious answer for an LFS based system." > Actually I've been toying with the idea of using a custom script to > make a series of mknod commands to add things I need at boot. Then I > can skip udev completely. In the final analysis, what does it add for > us? About the only thing I can think of that affects most users is > that it may change some permissions in /dev. I'd say it adds compatibility, if everybody else keeps using it. If we were to go that way, and everybody else stayed with udev, at what point do we become incompatible? -- Paul Rogers [email protected] Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates." (I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL :-) -- http://www.fastmail.com - Does exactly what it says on the tin -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
