On 25 November 2015 at 23:02, Paul Rogers <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm more or less in Ken's camp--I'd prefer a browser with fewer > dependencies, and one that isn't a snitch. My as-built tarball for > firefox-35 is 118MB, so none of them are lightweights. (Back in my day > we called it "creeping featuritis".) As to Flash, I'm using Shumway on > 35. If I never have to use Flash again it'd be too soon. > > I'd recommend keeping up with both Chromium and Iridium, even others, > and see if at some point they have something worth a strong > recommendation.
Still on the hunt for a light, secure, configurable graphical web browser that's not too difficult to handle I came across http://is.gd/COxf3u Xombrero. Has anybody had any experience of this? It looks to be well supported and there's a good howto here http://is.gd/iVHkPC Richard -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
