Em 11-12-2015 22:12, [email protected] escreveu: >> [email protected] wrote: >>> In the "configuration information" of GTK+ 3 section, the key >>> "gtk-fallback-icon-theme" is used. However, in the GTK+ Reference >>> manual >>> (https://developer.gnome.org/gtk3/stable/GtkSettings.html#GtkSettings--gtk-fallback-icon-theme), >>> it said: >>> >>> GtkSettings:gtk-fallback-icon-theme has been deprecated since >>> version 3.10 and should not be used in newly-written code. This >>> setting is ignored. >>> >>> So, is this key still valid actually? >> According to your reference, no, it is not used. However it doesn't >> seem to hurt anything. Fernando, should we just remove those two >> lines from the settings.ini files?
Well, I never use those two files, because costumize with GUIs. Don't have /etc/gtk-3.0/settings.ini. My current configuration file is: $ cat ~/.config/gtk-3.0/settings.ini [Settings] gtk-theme-name=Adwaita gtk-icon-theme-name=oxygen gtk-font-name=DejaVu Sans 12 gtk-cursor-theme-size=18 gtk-toolbar-style=GTK_TOOLBAR_BOTH_HORIZ gtk-toolbar-icon-size=GTK_ICON_SIZE_LARGE_TOOLBAR gtk-button-images=1 gtk-menu-images=1 gtk-enable-event-sounds=1 gtk-enable-input-feedback-sounds=1 gtk-xft-antialias=1 gtk-xft-hinting=1 gtk-xft-hintstyle=hintslight gtk-xft-rgba=rgb gtk-cursor-theme-name=Adwaita ISTR, ages ago verified that gtk-fallback-icon-theme did nothing. No problem removing it from the two files. > > Just to share my experience after some tests: > > According to the Arch Wiki > (https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/GTK%2B) and GTK+ 3 reference > manual > (https://developer.gnome.org/gtk3/stable/GtkSettings.html#GtkSettings--gtk-icon-theme-name), > we should use the key "gtk-icon-theme-name" to set the icon theme for > the applications that use GTK+ 3 (for example: mousepad). Also, the > default value of this key is "Adwaita". That means GTK+ 3 will search > the icon from "Adwaita" icon theme if this key is missing in the > configuration file so we do not need to set something likes > "gtk-icon-theme-name = "Adwaita"" in the file. (P.S. should we put > "Adwaita" icon theme in the Recommended list for the GTK+ 3 package?) > > Also, according to the "Icon Theme specification" > (http://standards.freedesktop.org/icon-theme-spec/icon-theme-spec-latest.html), > the "hicolor" icon theme should be available. (Refer to the Directory > Layout section of the specification): > > In order to have a place for third party applications to install their > icons there should always exist a theme called "hicolor" [1]. The data > for the hicolor theme is available for download at: > http://www.freedesktop.org/software/icon-theme/. Implementations are > required to look in the "hicolor" theme if an icon was not found in > the current theme. > It is a good idea to promote adwaita-icon-theme and hicolor-icon-theme from optional. I already do many, if not all, points discussed here, due to the gtk+ tests, and recognizing that hicolor-icon-theme ahould be installed before anything with icons is installed. -- []s, Fernando, aka Sísifo -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
