15. Dec 2015 01:18 by [email protected]:

> I'm beginning to think maybe my new direction ought to be an x86-64
> Multilib, as I have a few Core2 boxes and one i7.  I have some strategic
> questions though.
>
> I understand that some programs have "issues" with 64-bit systems.  How
> common is this?  How does one know how to plan for the "BLFS" stage?
> After an x86-64 system is created, and would be the host for future
> development, then what?  Presumably the next system doesn't need to be
> cross-compiled.  Can one use the regular LFS book?  I just want to know
> what it "means" to make the shift.
> --
> Paul Rogers
> [email protected]
> Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates."
> (I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL
> :-)
>
>

Since the last few years I've never used a 32 bit system and so far there 
have been no issues at all with a 64 bit system. However, I've not compiled a 
32 bit system on a 64 bit host so you might run into some trouble if you plan 
on doing that.





There have been some problems with a 64 bit only system but most of these are 
obsolete since a few years. There were problems with 32 bit proprietary flash 
versions and if you want to use Wine you need some 32 bit libraries.





--


Willie

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to