> I do not think this is reasonable for a couple of reasons. First, we > do not have the manpower to spend the time to figure that out. Second, > it creates a maintenance nightmare because at every package update > (often 3-5 per day, sometimes more), we would potentially need to to > update the dependent packages for changes.
Really? OK. I don't know your process. I figured it'd be trivial--as you're updating each package, on each page you put a link to its dependencies, just "click on it" and add the anchor pointing back. -- Paul Rogers [email protected] Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates." (I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL :-) -- http://www.fastmail.com - mmm... Fastmail... -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
