On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 01:41:18 +0100
Ken Moffat <[email protected]> wrote:
> I've just had the opportunity to compare /etc/fonts/fonts.conf in
> 7.9 and 7.10. Yes, they do differ in size by about 3.5K. The
> reason is that the table of valid blank characters almost at the end
> of the file has been removed.
.
.
> I'm puzzled why the absence of that table would alter things for an
> English speaker running LFS ...
Ken,
Watch out - both those config files load all the links in
/etc/fonts/conf.d:
<!-- Load local system customization file -->
<include ignore_missing="yes">conf.d</include>
So, we've also got to compare the list of the links in /etc/fonts/conf.d as
well as what is in (or just the sizes) the config files those links are
pointing to /etc/fonts/conf.avail
This is likely where the difference resides.
Cheers,
Mike
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
