I know nobody has been holding their breath for this report, after all, these 
old Core 2 Duo "Conroe" aren't even identified by Intel as CPUs with 
speculative execution flaws that they're NOT going to fix!  But Google does 
index our list, so for the benefit of others...

After a significant amount of testing, I found good evidence that the 
Firefox-55 crashes on some Yahoo.com/finance pages, and that error message, 
were _not_ caused by the 4.14.134 patch to an LFS-8.1 system on a Conroe.  I 
purged that system and started fresh with a clean install of my 8.1 "distro".  
With my "pio" package manager (which _does_ work) I cleanly removed its 4.14.62 
default kernel and incrementally patched with .98.  Firefox seemed stable.  So 
I did it again with .134, and again Firefox seems stable.  I didn't find out 
that _did_ cause the crashes, but again pio proved the X, GTK, Firefox chain 
had not been corrupted.  Perhaps something in my user configuration?

So, in short and for the benefit of anybody else making old kit work, more 
testing showed my suspicions were wrong, and 4.14.134 does seem to work.  Later 
patches are _not_ incompatible with these old CPUs.

-- 
Paul Rogers
paulgrog...@fastmail.fm
Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates."
(I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL :-)
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to