On Fri, 03 Apr 2020 09:49:24 +0200 Pierre Labastie via blfs-support 
<blfs-support@lists.linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:

> On Thu, 2020-04-02 at 11:22 +0200, Stephen Berman via blfs-support
> wrote:
>> On the weekend I built LFS SVN-20200319 with jhalfs (it was the first
>> time I tried jhalfs, and it succeeded), and yesterday I wanted to
>> start on BLFS, but when I ran the BLFS/update-lfs.sh script (after
>> fixing a syntax error, which I reported to the blfs-dev list), I saw
>> that LFS had been updated to SVN-20200401, and the following packages
>> have newer versions than the ones I installed: automake, e2fsprogs,
>> elfutils, meson, openssl, perl, xz.  So the versions of these
>> packages in /var/lib/jhalfs/BLFS/instpkg.xml conflict with the
>> installed versions.  Is it still ok to proceed with the BLFS build?
>> Or should I change the versions of these in instpkg.xml to the
>> installed versions?  Or should I update the installed packages, and
>> if so, can I do that without rebuilding any of the other LFS
>> packages?
>>
>
> I reply to this post, since, the one that clarified your question has
> been sent only to myself...

In fact it was also sent to the list:
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-support/2020-April/081939.html

> There are 3 points in your question:
> 1) instpkg.xml should only contain versions of packages really
> installed on your system, so do not change it, unless you know what you
> are doing (you may want to change it to fool jhalfs).
> 2) You do not need to run update-lfs.sh if you have used jhalfs for
> building lfs, and you have built the "blfs tools". Just run "make
> update" from the blfs_root directory, it'll update both books. Note
> that this just updates the book sources, not the packages installed on
> the system.
> 3) If you want to build new packages (including updating old packages),
> change to the blfs_root directory and run "make". Then tick the
> packages you want to build (You may search "Installed" to show the
> packages installed, which jav a newer version).
>
> The other advices about updating packages in lfs are still valid, of
> course. You can do that with jhalfs, as described above..
>
> HTH
> Pierre

Thanks.  I got it straightened out by rebuilding blfs_root after setting
working copy to the installed LFS, then following your suggestion to run
`make update'.

Steve Berman
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to