On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 23:11:37 -0500 DJ Lucas via blfs-support <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 10/1/2020 8:29 AM, Scott Andrews via blfs-support wrote: > > In a clean install of LFS-9.0 in an overlayfs... > Never mind a couple of days. Both issues are fixed in svn/git. I have > another minor group of changes added for lsbinstall, but lsbinstall > will not be feature complete yet. I'll push a release with the fix > over the weekend if I don't finish that work by Saturday. With your > version of the scripts, your test case should work with only the mod > 0 guard. I'll repeat here since it hasn't made it to the list yet. > > https://github.com/djlucas/LSB-Tools/commit/041b7f54cb483ae31646372dcbb802db17315ac5 > > Still not sure why line 297, however. In 0.7 it should be line 327. I am building my system conform to LSB. I remove all the rc.d directories and have rpm run install_initd. This is from a config file that I use to build a spec file from, then rpmbuild actually builds the package, then rpm installs it. I have bash scripts that automates the entire process. I can then build reproducible builds My process of building finds many errors in LFS and BLFS, that I know will not be addressed so I don't post them. Don't want the arguments Summary='The LSB-Tools package includes tools for Linux Standards Base LSB conformance' Name='lsbtools' Version='0.7' Release='1' License='Other' Url='https://github.com/djlucas/LSB-Tools/' Group='System-Utilities' Source='https://github.com/djlucas/LSB-Tools/releases/download/v0.7/LSB-Tools-0.7.tar.gz' Description='A distribution agnostic set of utilites for LSB compliance' Prep="%setup -q -n LSB-Tools-%{version} sed -i 's|intid|initd|' setup.py" Build='python3 setup.py build' Install='python3 setup.py install --optimize=1 --root=%{buildroot} ' Files='%defattr(-,root,root)' -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
