Spiro, this is where a guy in a tree locks the throttle on his saw, grabs the 
starter cord and drops the unit.  


 Bill Stephan
Kansas City, MO
(816)803-2469
William Stephan


-----Original Message-----
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 12/20/07 2:27:01 PM
To: "[email protected]"<[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [BlindHandyMan] My 2 cents about safety

what is the drop saw method in the movies?
What is missing in it's mechanics for safety?


On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, William Stephan wrote:

> When I was in the equipment leasing/rental business, for a while I was the
> guy who demonstrated the use of chainsaws to the folks we had as customers.
> I had thought originally that being blind might have distracted them from
> the safety stuff I was saying, but everyone I asked said it really stuck
> with them after seeing me start and use a saw.  Most of the first-time users
> were all set to do the old drop-start the way they saw linesmen and timber
> cutters do it in the movies, and disabusing them of that probably really did
> keep some injuries from happening.
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Dale Leavens
> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 11:20 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [BlindHandyMan] My 2 cents about safety
>
>
>
> There is also the numbers angle. While anyone could run over a can of gas
> with a snow blower the likelihood of a sighted person doing it is much less.
>
> I wouldn't suggest for a moment that the blind wouldn't or shouldn't have
> accidents neither would I suggest that sighted people on the whole are
> usually good judges of where all the dangers lay or which are the more
> significant ones.
>
> with sighted people cutting fingers off every day it is unrealistic to
> assume no blind person will ever cut off a finger, that would be expecting a
> standard of function above that of sighted persons. While this may often be
> true it is nevertheless an unrealistic expectation. I am betting that per
> pedestrian mile walked blind people are less frequently hit by cars than
> sighted people, I would love to see someone collect statistics on that. We
> may well actually be safer on foot than sighted people and we may, in
> general be safer with chain saws or other tools than sighted people.
> Certainly I have never heard of a blind person killed in an industrial
> accident the numbers must be very small but then the numbers of blind
> persons working in industry are way too damn small.
>
> I well remember an argument with an insurance salesman when I was purchasing
> business insurance many many years ago. I wanted a premium discount since I
> had to sign a waver that I could not claim blindness as a work limiting
> disability. I felt since that was a potentially very expensive claim they
> would never face it limited their liability and I should get a discount for
> that.
>
> He tried to tell me that my chances of a work disabling injury were greater
> since I was blind. I countered that I wasn't so sure of that, I hardly ever
> flew an aeroplane or drove a car or played football or hockey or drove drunk
> or any number of other high risk activities sighted people commonly engaged
> in.
>
> I didn't earn my discount of course but it did make me think about this sort
> of thing quite a bit.
>
> Sometimes the injuries we might receive have a bigger impact than they might
> to a sighted person. I truly don't want to damage my hearing and I fear I
> have neglected it a little over the years. I really need my fingers too. Of
> course there is Dennis Brown who was a sighted guy when military ordinance
> blew off his hands, the lower half of his face, destroyed something like 80%
> of his hearing and blinded him. I wonder if as a blind person now people
> would tell him not to fiddle with such dangerous equipment? Probably though
> it didn't bother the military when he could see.
>
> Just some thoughts to thicken the soup.
>
> Dale Leavens, Cochrane Ontario Canada
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:DLeavens%40puc.net> net
> Skype DaleLeavens
> Come and meet Aurora, Nakita and Nanook at our polar bear habitat.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: RJ
> To: blindhandyman@ <mailto:blindhandyman%40yahoogroups.com> yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 10:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [BlindHandyMan] My 2 cents about safety
>
> It sounds like the doctor that ask to see my thumb a few days after I tried
> to cut it off with a hand ax while splitting wood. He asked how in the hell
> did you do that? I told him with a ax. He went on and on how a blind person
> shouldn't be using tools that are dangerous. I calmly ask him how many blind
> persons verses sighted people he sees that cut off a finger or two, and bet
> him there were more sighted persons than blind persons that come to him for
> this reason. He gave in by telling me after thirty years dealing with me, he
> should have known better than try to talk sense into my head. By the way,
> the thumb did heal without medical intervention, which did amazed the
> doctor. And if the truth was known, it also amazed me.
> RJ
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: robert moore
> To: Blind Handyman
> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 18:44
> Subject: [BlindHandyMan] My 2 cents about safety
>
> I am not an authority on safety but this is my 2 cents worth. Concerning
> chainsaws or any other potentially dangerous piece of equipment. Lets start
> with the assumption you know the proper use and technique for the tool. The
> bottom line as it relates to blind VS sighted is this.
> If any one gets hurt it is the same for sighted or blind alike. I think
> there are 3 root causes for any injury. First you are doing some thing
> stupid and or not paying attention.
> Second the element of the unknown, such as a piece of mettle in the wood
> that is completely concealed. Making it impossible for the sighted and blind
> alike to know it is there.
> And finally equipment failure. Even if the tool appears to be in working
> condition there is always the unexpected failure that cannot be anticipated.
> If any one wants to take issue or add to any of these points, please do. I
> am very safety conscious and any further comments on this topic I will not
> take offence to.
> Thanks for letting me rant.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>

Reply via email to