Yeah, that's what I thought despite what the sales guy said.

-----Original Message-----
From: blindhandyman@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Michael Baldwin
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2008 4:30 AM
To: blindhandyman@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re: [BlindHandyMan] Why Choose a Tankless Water Heater?

Nope, 30 foot of pipe, is 30 foot of pipe, no matter how you heat your
water.
Move the heater closer, or get point of use water heaters for the baths.
Michael


_____ 

From: blindhandyman@yahoogroups.com <mailto:blindhandyman%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:blindhandyman@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:blindhandyman%40yahoogroups.com> ]
On Behalf Of tunecollector
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2008 6:14 AM
To: blindhandyman@yahoogroups.com <mailto:blindhandyman%40yahoogroups.com> 
Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re: [BlindHandyMan] Why Choose a Tankless Water Heater?

In southern California, water is an issue too. Will the hot water from a
tankless get to the outlet faster than a tank water heater?

-----Original Message-----
From: blindhandyman@ <mailto:blindhandyman%40yahoogroups.com>
yahoogroups.com [mailto:blindhandyman@
<mailto:blindhandyman%40yahoogroups.com> yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Bob Kennedy
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2008 2:58 AM
To: blindhandyman@ <mailto:blindhandyman%40yahoogroups.com> yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [BlindHandyMan] Why Choose a Tankless Water Heater?

The only ones I've seen have been gas powered. One safety/economy feature
that I haven't decided if I like is the minimum flow rate before it will
fire. They have or let's say some have, so we don't get out of hand here,
some have a minimum of 2.5 gallons per minute flow rate before they will
fire. I'm guessing this is so a dripping faucet won't keep the heater
running all the time. But you have to turn on a pretty good blast to reach
2.5 gallons per minute. 

I've really only seen them in a commercial setting before. I know they are
getting more popular in houses I just haven't been around any in the house
yet. 

The commercial ones I saw worked in a restaurant and were strong enough to
keep their dish washer running with water at 160 degrees F. Pretty
impressive recovery rate.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:spiro%40netaxs.com> com
<mailto:spiro%40netaxs.com> 
To: blindhandyman@ <mailto:blindhandyman%40yahoogroups.com> yahoogroups.com
<mailto:blindhandyman%40yahoogroups.com> 
Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2008 11:57 PM
Subject: Re: [BlindHandyMan] Why Choose a Tankless Water Heater?

Okay, in the described package, there must be a super heating system. Are 
they all electric? if not, do they use super thin, and thin walled tubing?
I can imagine the water flow for a shoer could overwhelm a unit without 
tricks up it's sleeving.
How do they work?
How about for filling a bathtub?
Would a house have one for each bathroom, and then general purposes a 
larger one?

On Sun, 23 Mar 2008, Ray Boyce wrote:

> Q: I'm considering replacing my old water heater with a tankless version.
> Are these things all they're cracked up to be?
>
> A: Tankless water heaters are likely the wave of the future for
residential
> hot water. It's the difference between having a "smart" water heater or a
> "dumb" one. Tankless heaters offer on-demand convenience. Because these
> heaters don't have a holding tank, water is heated on an as-needed basis,
> not heated and stored for hours like a traditional tank. This reduces
energy
> loss from sitting water and also guarantees you'll never be cold if you're
> the last one in the shower. Plus, tankless heaters are powerful, yet
> compact. Most can be wall-mounted inside or outside the home. Although
sizes
> vary, the average tankless unit is about 24 inches high, 18 inches wide
and
> 9 inches deep-significantly smaller than the traditional 40-gallon tank.
> Plus, with many tankless units you can dial in the water temperature with
a
> digital controller.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 

Reply via email to