Hey that's a good idea.  When I was a mechanic, I used those for all kinds of 
things.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: NLG 
  To: blindhandyman@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 6:09 AM
  Subject: Re: [BlindHandyMan] Talking Digital Multimeter





  No but I have used a makeshift one that was louder. I pulled the buzzer unit 
from under the dash of a 80's Chevy truck, hooked up two wires to it and used 
it as a continuity tester when I couldn't find mine.

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Spiro 
  To: blindhandyman@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 11:02 PM
  Subject: Re: [BlindHandyMan] Talking Digital Multimeter

  well, have you ever used a cont tester that was much quieter?
  Or to ask more directly, ever notice the volume level of others? I don't 
  know what brand Science Products was using.
  Your statements are perfectly reasonable.
  Tough to describe, my cont circuit is like a quiet microwave, like the 
  beep of changing bands on the C.Crane C.C.Radio, and I wish I could think 
  of another item that is common.
  But thanks.
  Sounds like it would be enough.

  On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, NLG wrote:

  > Loud to me and loud to you or someone else may be totally different If I 
were checking continuity and had a radio on, at normal volume and not so loud 
that the people in the next county could hear it,, I would have no problems 
hearing it. I also can hear it while my air compressor is running, however if 
my telephone rings on the other side of the garage while my air compressor is 
running, I sometimes don't hear it.
  >
  > ----- Original Message -----
  > From: Spiro
  > To: blindhandyman@yahoogroups.com
  > Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 5:50 PM
  > Subject: Re: [BlindHandyMan] Talking Digital Multimeter
  >
  >
  >
  >
  >
  > grrr, means I really have to get one.
  > How loud is the continuity tester?
  > I am currently using a 9 volt beeper from Rat Shack as the cont tester in
  > mine is far too quiet.
  > I like to listen to NPR or Newsweek tapes while working when it's not
  > baseball, hockey or football on the radio.
  >
  > On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, NLG wrote:
  >
  > > Yes. Three double A batteries power the unit.
  > >
  > > ----- Original Message -----
  > > From: Spiro
  > > To: blindhandyman@yahoogroups.com
  > > Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 2:48 PM
  > > Subject: Re: [BlindHandyMan] Talking Digital Multimeter
  > >
  > >
  > >
  > >
  > >
  > > do they run on batteries?
  > > I have an expensive model from Science Products that is a standard meter
  > > with a speak unit affixed and I have to run it on an adaptor. I'm lucky
  > > it's not a "woodwork" item or I'd have cut that cord or broken it by now.
  > >
  > > On Sun, 31 May 2009, NLG wrote:
  > >
  > > > I have three of them. The first one bit the dust, however, I used it so 
often that I bought two more, one is in storage just in case they quit making 
them. The price you quoted is about the same as I paid a year ago.
  > > >
  > > > ----- Original Message -----
  > > > From: Betsy Whitney
  > > > To: blindhandyman-yahoogroups.com
  > > > Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 2:05 PM
  > > > Subject: [BlindHandyMan] Talking Digital Multimeter
  > > >
  > > >
  > > >
  > > >
  > > >
  > > >
  > > > >I saw this item and wondered if anyone had any experience with it. I
  > > > >also want to know if the price is reasonable.
  > > > >Marlin P. Jones and Associates has a Talking Digital Multimeter for 
$39.95.
  > > > >It measures voltage and current and speaks the results. Two AA
  > > > >batteries are required.
  > > > Thanks, Betsy
  > > >
  > > > Teamwork: Together we achieve the extraordinary.
  > > >
  > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  > > >
  > > >
  > > >
  > > >
  > > >
  > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  > > >
  > > >
  > >
  > >
  > >
  > >
  > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  > >
  > >
  >
  >
  >
  >
  > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  >
  >

  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



  

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to