Tom:  A color identifier is a device which examines an object and speaks its 
color.  There are several different types and models out there.  My wife has 
one from APH which works pretty well, and I have one made my Codefactory on my 
Nokia N82 cell phone.  You have to calibrate mine for the lighting conditions, 
but once you do that, it works pretty well.  It will, when set to do so, give 
you the confidence level as well, multiple colors and the location of the 
different colors it sees.  The N82's camera though doesn't allow the software 
to distinguish between light and darker shades, but other than that, it's a 
handy thing to have.

Bill Stephan 
Kansas Citty MO 
Email: wstep...@everestkc.net 
Phone: (816)803-2469


----- Original Message -----
From: Tom Hodges <tomhod...@fuse.net>
Date: Friday, July 10, 2009 3:26 pm
Subject: RE: [BlindHandyMan] What is the best color identifier?
> Could someone please tell me what a color identifier is?  
> 
> 
> 
> From: blindhandyman@yahoogroups.com 
> [mailto:blindhandy...@yahoogroups.com]on Behalf Of Spiro 
> Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 3:48 PM 
> To: Blind Handymen's Forum 
> Subject: Re: [BlindHandyMan] What is the best color identifier? 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> is it shaped like a borito? 
> I like the Cobalt the best and it is shaped like a borito. 
> There is a reset button on the bottom. I've heard that the reset 
> proceedure is to turn it off, put on the lid, and hold the reset 
> while 
> sliding the volume button to the first "on" position. 
> Though they say that the more expensive the model the more info 
> you get. 
> 
> On Fri, 10 Jul 2009, Jim King wrote: 
> 
> > Which color identifier is the most accurate? I don't know the 
> make of the 
> > one I have but purple is often gray and green is also gray. This 
> is the 
> > case even with a new set of batteries. Maybe I have a color 
> blind color 
> > identifier. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Jim King 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] 
> 
> 

Reply via email to