Yesterday I went to a local woodworking store to buy magnetic feather boards.  
When I went in a man and his wife were their and I waited for them to complete 
their business before they helped me.  After they left, they told me that they 
just bought a Saw Stop.  Tjhe the store manager told me that they now sell more 
Saw Stop table saws than all the other brands put together.  He then said that 
when a man and his wife come into the store to buy a table saw, they always buy 
a Saw Stop.
He also mentioned that they sell a lot of cartridges, and some times have a 
hard time keeping them in stock.

The Saw Stop may have weakened Delta enough to cause it to be bought by Stanley.
John
http://WhiteCane.org
http://BlindWoodWorker.com
http://HolyTeaClub.comcom\whitecane
http://anellos.ws

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Dan Rossi 
  To: blindhandyman@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 10:21 PM
  Subject: Re: [BlindHandyMan] Table saw injury report.


    
  The report that started all of this claimed that four out of five table 
  saw accidents were caused by contact with the blade. Less than one out of 
  five injuries were due to kick-back. So, the Saw Stop would prevent the 
  rather large majority of these injuries. The SawStop will not prevent 
  accidents, it will prevent injuries. If you read the blog, the accidence 
  were mainly due to a split second loss of judgment, not because someone 
  was trying to use their table saw to free-hand cut a coconut.

  The SawStop is merely insurance, it isn't a replacement for proper use of 
  a table saw. And, like I said in an earlier message, if you truly believe 
  you are 100% on your best, 100% of the time, well, you are a better man 
  than I.

  All of the guys on the blog who were injured, all believed they knew, and 
  practiced safe sawing. And, most of them admit that they now wish they 
  had been using a SawStop.

  -- 
  Blue skies.
  Dan Rossi
  Carnegie Mellon University.
  E-Mail: d...@andrew.cmu.edu
  Tel: (412) 268-9081


  

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to