On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 3:56 PM Patrick Meenan <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks. I emailed experimentation-dev just to be sure because the
> underlying feature didn't change and I want to avoid confusion about
> multiple different trials for the same feature name.
>

To clarify, I didn't mean this needs a new experiment name. I just meant
that from an API owners' perspective, the previous experiment should not
impact the timeframes of this one, as there's been a 2 years break in
between them. Apologies for not being clearer.


>
> The main thing that is changing is that the dev ecosystem now has pretty
> heavy interest in using it to improve LCP so gathering feedback will be a
> lot easier than the last go-around which was focused on async scripts
> (which already had a hack people were using).
>
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 9:42 AM Yoav Weiss <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for working on this!!
>>
>> On an administrative note, this should be considered a new OT, as the
>> previous one was run a while ago.
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 5:16 PM Patrick Meenan <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Contact [email protected], [email protected],
>>> [email protected], [email protected]
>>>
>>> Explainerhttps://github.com/WICG/priority-hints/blob/main/EXPLAINER.md
>>>
>>> Specificationhttps://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/
>>>
>>> Summary
>>>
>>> Priority Hints provide developers a way to indicate a resource's
>>> relative importance to the browser, allowing more control over the order
>>> resources are loaded. Many factors influence a resource's priority in
>>> browsers. These include type, visibility, and preload status of a resource.
>>> Priority Hints introduces a developer-set "importance" attribute allowing
>>> developers to influence the computed priority of a resource. Supported
>>> importance values are auto, low, and high.
>>>
>>>
>>> Blink componentBlink>Loader
>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3ELoader>
>>>
>>> Search tagspriority-hints
>>> <https://www.chromestatus.com/features#tags:priority-hints>, priority
>>> hints <https://www.chromestatus.com/features#tags:priority%20hints>
>>>
>>> TAG review
>>>
>>> TAG review statusPending
>>>
>>> Risks
>>>
>>>
>>> Interoperability and Compatibility
>>>
>>> Gecko: No signal
>>> WebKit: No signal
>>> Web developers: Strongly positive
>>>
>>>
>>> Goals for experimentation
>>>
>>> The goal is to re-start the origin trial experiment for Priority Hints
>>> with a focus on some specific use cases that have generated significant
>>> developer interest:
>>>
>>>    - Boost the priority of the LCP image for a page by specifying
>>>    importance="high" on the image element, causing LCP to happen sooner.
>>>    - Increase the priority of async scripts using better semantics than
>>>    the current hack that is commonly used (inserting a link preload for the
>>>    async script)
>>>    - Decreasing the priority of late-body scripts to allow for better
>>>    sequencing with images.
>>>    - Decreasing the priority of CSS to allow for sequencing with
>>>    parser-blocking scripts.
>>>    - Allow for varying priorities of javascript-initiated fetches.
>>>
>>> The bulk of the experiment will be focused on making sure the API
>>> surface meets developers needs and works as expected.
>>>
>>>
>>> Reason this experiment is being extended
>>>
>>> The previous experiment was run before the recent focus on core web
>>> vitals and LCP in particular and did not generate as much developer
>>> interest as there is now. There were also prioritization issues with
>>> preload that are fixed in 95 that made it difficult to experiment with for
>>> the script case. There is pretty significant demand from developers for the
>>> knobs that Priority Hints provide, particularly for improving LCP.
>>>
>>
>> I also suspect that the server-side support for priorities improved since
>> the original OT, at least in some servers.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Ongoing technical constraints
>>>
>>> None
>>>
>>> Debuggability
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac,
>>> Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)?Yes
>>>
>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>> ?No
>>>
>>> Flag namePriorityHints
>>>
>>> Requires code in //chrome?False
>>>
>>> Tracking bughttps://crbug.com/821464
>>>
>>> Estimated milestones
>>> OriginTrial desktop last 101
>>> OriginTrial desktop first 96
>>> OriginTrial android last 101
>>> OriginTrial android first 96
>>>
>>
>> Do you have partners lined up to start experimenting in M96?
>> Any particular reason for needing to run it till M101? If not, it may be
>> better to run it till M99 (inclusive) and ask for an extension with what
>> we've learned.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>>> https://www.chromestatus.com/feature/5273474901737472
>>>
>>> Links to previous Intent discussionsIntent to Experiment:
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/jpeSdM897Xw/m/CY6tothSDgAJ
>>>
>>>
>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>>> <https://www.chromestatus.com/>.
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAPq58w4GGUARoL%3DKrhCPDG43xWQMk3FuUK-_-zHxM_Tr1tXGKQ%40mail.gmail.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAPq58w4GGUARoL%3DKrhCPDG43xWQMk3FuUK-_-zHxM_Tr1tXGKQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfWFHaam-cqdNUct-7VYJ5qWXxyJJ1Ax7e3SP5ND3StWQA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to