Is it true that we are now limiting this API to fire on Iframes only when 
they gain focus ? 

  No, we're just delaying contextloss events randomly now. All events are 
being delayed by a tunable amount of time.

Also, due to delays in getting this out we need to move the milestones from 
M92-95 to M95-98.



On Wednesday, July 7, 2021 at 1:03:47 PM UTC-4 sush...@microsoft.com wrote:

> Hello, 
>
> Just catching up on this discussion. We are super interested in context 
> lost and canvas 2d improvements.
>
> Some questions :
> Is it true that we are now limiting this API to fire on Iframes only when 
> they gain focus ? 
> This would be problematic for us as some of our properties that want to 
> use this are served from within Iframes. 
>
> - Even without Iframes, can we use page visibility as a trigger to fire 
> these context lost rather than focus. 
> This way if a tab is already visible it gets context lost right away. 
> Iframes would use the main frame's page visibility and so
> the user should not see broken content.
>
> Thanks,
> Sushanth
> On Friday, July 2, 2021 at 10:37:45 AM UTC-7 Theodore Olsauskas-Warren 
> wrote:
>
>> @Theodore Olsauskas-Warren, re *context loss*: If we delayed context 
>>> loss until focus events, would that be acceptable from an S&P perspective? 
>>
>>
>> Yep, that sounds good. When this came through the review process that was 
>> considered by the S&P reviewers as a reasonable mitigation.
>>
>> Theo.
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 8:57 PM Jeremy Roman <jbr...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 1:33 PM 'Aaron Krajeski' via blink-dev <
>>> blin...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>
>> Hey everyone! Sorry for the delay in response, blink-dev got removed from 
>>>> the "reply all" chain and I was shouting into the ether. We are code and 
>>>> test complete, just have a few more whatwg specs to merge.
>>>>
>>>> @Theodore Olsauskas-Warren, re *context loss*: If we delayed context 
>>>> loss until focus events, would that be acceptable from an S&P perspective? 
>>>>   The remaining issue is for contexts within iframes. These will not 
>>>> receive a "focus" event unless the user focuses the iframe itself, but in 
>>>> the interest of getting this out we could live with that until we have a 
>>>> better idea.
>>>>
>>>> Some updates from the TAG review (
>>>> https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/627):
>>>>   1. For the *CSSColorValue input* we are going to rely on the fact 
>>>> that CSSColorValues can implicitly convert to string, and 
>>>> CanvasRenderingContext2D styles all accept strings as input. This makes 
>>>> for 
>>>> a much smaller spec change. We can still use the optimization of taking 
>>>> the 
>>>> object directly, as the functionality is the same.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Make sure you check that toString hasn't been replaced on the prototype 
>>> chain, and otherwise that this skipped step will actually be equivalent to 
>>> converting to string and then to CSSColorValue. It's a common pitfall to 
>>> assume this sort of optimization is valid but in general it isn't, at least 
>>> without accounting for all the weird edges.
>>>  
>>>
>>   2. WebKit says *Perspective Transforms *are a no-go. With a heavy, 
>>>> affine heart we're putting this feature on the backburner for now.
>>>>
>>>> The mozilla and webkit signals more or less rehash what's already 
>>>> debated on the TAG thread.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks all for the feedback! Think we'll be ready to launch this origin 
>>>> trial soon?
>>>>
>>>> Aaron
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 7:09 AM Aaron Krajeski <aar...@google.com> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> sauski@: Talking around with the rest of the team and with the WebGL 
>>>>> folks, there is a legitimate privacy concern with the contextloss event. 
>>>>> The amount of data would be relatively small, as a tracker would have to 
>>>>> be 
>>>>> active on two domains simultaneously during a GPU or driver crash. 
>>>>> Nevertheless, the data would be unique enough that it's worth designing 
>>>>> around this vulnerability. WebGL and WebGPU will have the same issue.
>>>>>   We're now actively looking into how to delay the event until focus.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 2:32 AM Theodore Olsauskas-Warren <
>>>>> sau...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I should clarify, we're concerned this allows a join across 
>>>>>> *different* 1P contexts. Both the examples you've given are scoped 
>>>>>> to the same origin. As an example of our concern, if the user has Site A 
>>>>>> open in one tab, and Site B open in another tab, and both Site A & Site 
>>>>>> B 
>>>>>> receive a context loss event at the same time, then they have a precise 
>>>>>> timestamp with which they can later use to join the user's separate 
>>>>>> identities on Site A & Site B. This is type of information is especially 
>>>>>> concerning as it is independent of other joinable information (such as 
>>>>>> an 
>>>>>> IP address, which may be shared or proxied).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tuesday, May 4, 2021 at 7:50:20 PM UTC+2 PhistucK wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > allowing a join across 1P contexts
>>>>>>> Can you explain the concern given the existing storage event and 
>>>>>>> the BroadcastChannel API (and others, I suppose)?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ☆*PhistucK*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 3:21 PM 'Theodore Olsauskas-Warren' via 
>>>>>>> blink-dev <blin...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Some quick feedback from the S&P review, we're have some concerns 
>>>>>>>> about the ContextLoss event being delivered to multiple tabs 
>>>>>>>> simultaneously, and thus allowing a join across 1P contexts.  Would it 
>>>>>>>> be 
>>>>>>>> feasible to restrict this to only the active tab? Perhaps delivering 
>>>>>>>> the 
>>>>>>>> event once the tab has regained focus if it occured whilst the tab 
>>>>>>>> didn't 
>>>>>>>> have focus? (Apologies if I've missed something that already mitigates 
>>>>>>>> this 
>>>>>>>> in the design).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Saturday, May 1, 2021 at 8:52:11 PM UTC+2 Aaron Krajeski wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the reminder Yoav!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Mozilla standards positions thread: 
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/519
>>>>>>>>> I've sent an email describing the proposal to 
>>>>>>>>> webki...@lists.webkit.org, I assume it will appear here soon 
>>>>>>>>> https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 4:54 AM Yoav Weiss <yoav...@chromium.org> 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Friendly ping on bit.ly/blink-signals :)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 5:23 PM 'Aaron Krajeski' via blink-dev <
>>>>>>>>>> blin...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> TAG review issue: 
>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/627
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 5:22 PM Aaron Krajeski <
>>>>>>>>>>> aar...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks all for the feedback and thanks all for no one pointing 
>>>>>>>>>>>> out how gracelessly I started this thread!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> @Chris Harrelson Sorry about that, here's a better link: 
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/4809. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>    1. Can you help me understand why no TAG review was 
>>>>>>>>>>>>    requested? This is a somewhat substantial addition to an 
>>>>>>>>>>>> existing API, and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>    their input seems like it might be valuable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I was using Canvas color management I2E as a template. I'll ask 
>>>>>>>>>>>> for a TAG review and see their feedback.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>    1. Would you mind filing requests for signals with our 
>>>>>>>>>>>>    friends at other vendors via the channels specified in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>    https://bit.ly/blink-signals? It's certainly positive to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>    see participation in GitHub threads, but they've asked us to 
>>>>>>>>>>>> use their 
>>>>>>>>>>>>    official channels for these intents.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes! will do.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>    1. You suggest that Edge is already shipping these APIs, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>    but the link provided isn't public. Have they upstreamed an 
>>>>>>>>>>>> implementation 
>>>>>>>>>>>>    to Chromium that's already enabled?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, they worked on the contextloss api, though ultimately our 
>>>>>>>>>>>> team ended up implementing it. Nothing is enabled yet, it's still 
>>>>>>>>>>>> all 
>>>>>>>>>>>> behind the `NewCanvas2DAPI` flag (which gets enabled with 
>>>>>>>>>>>> experimental web 
>>>>>>>>>>>> platform features.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll get back to you on 1, 2 (TAG and official signals, 
>>>>>>>>>>>> inlining comments messed up the list numbering) and respond to 
>>>>>>>>>>>> this thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>   Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>     Aaron
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 3:43 PM Alex Russell <
>>>>>>>>>>>> sligh...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Per today's API OWNERs meeting, very conditional LGTM to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> experiment with all the caveats of Mike's note. Would appreciate 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> reporting back about both what we learn from the trial from 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> developers as 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> well as any TAG feedback.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, April 22, 2021 at 12:01:42 PM UTC-7 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mk...@chromium.org wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Aaron,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a few questions that I'll add here rather than inline, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as the thread's formatting is already a little strange:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    1. Can you help me understand why no TAG review was 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    requested? This is a somewhat substantial addition to an 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> existing API, and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    their input seems like it might be valuable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    2. Would you mind filing requests for signals with our 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    friends at other vendors via the channels specified in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    https://bit.ly/blink-signals? It's certainly positive to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    see participation in GitHub threads, but they've asked us to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use their 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    official channels for these intents.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    3. You suggest that Edge is already shipping these APIs, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    but the link provided isn't public. Have they upstreamed an 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implementation 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    to Chromium that's already enabled?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -mike
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 5:24 PM 'Aaron Krajeski' via 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blink-dev <blin...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Looks like posting on blink-dev just merged the threads 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 🤦‍♀️. Double apologies for the noise. This is our real-bonafide 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> intent to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experiment thread. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:04 AM Aaron Krajeski <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aar...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Contact emails
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aar...@chromium.org, fs...@chromium.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Explainer/Chrome Dev Summit Video
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/fserb/canvas2d
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/dfOKFSDG7IM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> API spec
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In progress
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   WHATWG:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Text Modifiers <https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/6560>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Filters <https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Perspective Transforms 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/5620>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reset() <https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/5618>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CSSColorValue <https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/5616>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> willReadFrequently 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/5614>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RoundRect <https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/5619>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ConicGradient <https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/5431>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Context Loss <https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/4809>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   MDN 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Conic gradient 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/CanvasRenderingContext2D/createConicGradient>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Text Modifiers 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/GoogleChromeLabs/puppy-content/pull/23> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (via ChromeLabs/puppy-content)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Summary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Updated functionality for the Canvas2D API. Adds nine new 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> features/functions to CanvasRenderingContext2D:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   - "ContextLost" and "ContextRestored" events
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   - "willReadFrequently" option for canvases where lots of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> readback is expected
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   - CSSColorValues as style inputs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   - More CSS text modifier support
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   - A reset function
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   - A roundRect draw primitive
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   - Full 4x4 transformation matrices
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   - Conic gradients
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   - Better support for SVG filters
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blink component
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blink>Canvas 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3ECanvas>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Timeline: M92-95
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TAG review
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> None
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TAG review status
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not applicable
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Risks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Interoperability and Compatibility
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Edge: Shipped (partially) (context loss email chain 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#search/context+loss/FMfcgxwKjTVSMPdvFTmdMhFZGhSgXHpp?compose=GTvVlcSMTtTbZnFKvhlzwSkBXcHMtJLKRRlXNsgBVtZDFtNLMBrfzVbGstsnVgPrggQzXtKZdKbjv>)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Very interested in context loss. Helped with implementation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gecko: In development (
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/5431) Already 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implemented conic gradient. Okay with willReadFrequently, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transforms and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reset. Push back on filters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WebKit: Positive (
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/5619) Some push back 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on perspective transforms. Positive signal on text modifiers, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> round rect 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and color input.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Web developers: Positive (
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dfOKFSDG7IM) CDN talk in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> December was received very positively.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Goals for experimentation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Allow third party developers to use the API and provide 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feedback.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Reason this experiment is being extended
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> None
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ongoing technical constraints
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> None
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Windows, Mac, Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes (in progress)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RoundRect 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/tree/7b0ebaccc62b566a1965396e5be7bb2bc06f841f/html/canvas/element/path-objects>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reset() 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/tree/master/html/canvas/element/reset>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Perspective Transforms 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/tree/master/html/canvas/element/transformations>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Context Loss 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://source.chromium.org/chromium/chromium/src/+/master:third_party/blink/web_tests/fast/canvas/canvas-lost-gpu-context.html?q=f:web_tests%20canvas%20context%20lost&sq=package:chromium>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (this is not testable on WPT)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Filters 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/tree/master/html/canvas/element/shadows>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CSSColorValue Input 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/2794982>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WillReadFrequently 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://source.chromium.org/chromium/chromium/src/+/master:third_party/blink/web_tests/fast/canvas/OffscreenCanvas-2d-willReadFrequently.html?q=f:web_tests%20canvas%20willreadfrequently&sq=package:chromium>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (testable in WPT, work in progress to add tests there)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Conic Gradient 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/blob/master/html/canvas/element/fill-and-stroke-styles/2d.gradient.conic.html>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Text Modifiers 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/tree/master/html/canvas/element/drawing-text-to-the-canvas>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Flag name
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NewCanvas2DAPI
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tracking bugs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Transforms: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1140535
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Color: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1187575
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Filters: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1169216
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RoundRect: crbug.com/1123971
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Reset: crbug.com/1131137
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Context Loss: crbug.com/1164059
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Will read frequently: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1090180
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Conic gradient: crbug.com/1097034
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Text Modifiers: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1137055
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Launch bug
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1201359
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/6051647656558592
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from it, send an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/ec01b3df-dc82-4cbc-94c4-3efaf1186728n%40chromium.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/ec01b3df-dc82-4cbc-94c4-3efaf1186728n%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from it, send an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAPhTwY0wkjp57QPLBOT76xCKXP1oktezxTP9J_toe3cVh-chNg%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAPhTwY0wkjp57QPLBOT76xCKXP1oktezxTP9J_toe3cVh-chNg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from 
>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
>>>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAPhTwY3WmgqAJ8QL9NmmOe4O_1pj-ajF0XUuNWz59SDA42F%3DRQ%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAPhTwY3WmgqAJ8QL9NmmOe4O_1pj-ajF0XUuNWz59SDA42F%3DRQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>>>>>> send an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfV14%3DoWr34r%2BiG%2BLWezEU0xtPpmqogO3_p1ohXZeFBtAw%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfV14%3DoWr34r%2BiG%2BLWezEU0xtPpmqogO3_p1ohXZeFBtAw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>>>> send an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/04fbf598-e342-4551-ae18-86880b9b7b1cn%40chromium.org
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/04fbf598-e342-4551-ae18-86880b9b7b1cn%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
>>>>
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAPhTwY2TMCj8y%2BggP62fNsFRPiS%2Bk%3DgwpdbXFN0HOahwXq0Bqw%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAPhTwY2TMCj8y%2BggP62fNsFRPiS%2Bk%3DgwpdbXFN0HOahwXq0Bqw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/43eb1c9c-5b84-41fc-9269-ff17b6dd7f5en%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to