+people who may be interested in this.

On Thursday, September 23, 2021 at 12:21:51 PM UTC-4 Sasha Tokarev wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I have a proposal to integration with Windows SSO in Chrome.
>
> Currently Windows has ability to join device to cloud identity, like AAD, 
> MSA. When a device is joined to a cloud identity provider (IDP), it would 
> be great if I’m as a user do not need enter credentials, when I’m using a 
> service, which uses IDP where my device is joined to. I’m consented to have 
> single sign on (SSO) when I joined the device, and trust IDP to protect my 
> identity and do not allow an authorized access. If I do not trust, I should 
> not join my device. Additionally, sometimes web resources, that I’m 
> accessing to as a user, are owned by organization where I work or study. 
> Hence, an organization administrator should be able to manage access to 
> such resources based on the quality of my device, e.g., prevent access if 
> the device doesn’t make malware scans or doesn’t have latest security 
> patches etc.
>
> Edge has this feature built in, in Chrome we must use a special extension 
> https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/windows-10-accounts/ppnbnpeolgkicgegkbkbjmhlideopiji
>
> While using extension works, the built-in experience is better, as we have 
> with Windows Integrated authentication.
>
> In high level it should work like this, if I’m accessing to a resource, 
> from a joined device.
>
>    1. *Resource* (e.g., www.mywork.com) will redirect me for the 
>    authentication to the cloud identity provider(
>    https://login.microsoftonline.com). The request will have a redirect 
>    URI that IDP will use to return a token.
>    2. *User agent* (Chrome) will detect this navigation and call an OS 
>    API for producing a crypto-protected SSO cookies, which has device and 
> user 
>    information. This cookie will be appended to the request as a header or 
>    cookie.
>    3. *Cloud identity provider* ( https://login.microsoftonline.com ): 
>       1. Detects presence of the SSO cookies, validates them by checking 
>       signature, and authenticates the user and device. 
>       2. Validates that the supplied redirect uri is registered for this 
>       application.
>       3. Validates if the resource owner (enterprise admin or user) 
>       authorizes access to the resource.
>       4. Applies consent policy and ask consent if needed, for example 
>       enterprises, when they own the resource can pre-consent access by their 
>       employees. Note, It is responsibility of IDP to ensure that only 
> authorized 
>       and consented applications can access users’ identity.
>       5. Read device identity, and checks the state of device, that 
>       reported out of band by device management system.
>       6. If all checks are fine, the IDP redirect back to the resource 
>       with a token.
>    4. *User agent* (Chrome) should not do much, just to make sure it will 
>    not include SSO headers (as in case of some HTTP Redirects user-agent 
>    repeats the same headers) and cookies to the resource, to prevent its 
>    disclosure.
>    5. *Resource* gets the token and provides service to the user.
>
>  
>
> Note, a malicious web site will not be able to access user identity 
> without explicit user consent, and if it is an enterprise account, then it 
> should check admin authorization for this application. One may think that 
> if we have SSO, now we need to think about protection from malicious web 
> sites. However, this issue is not relevant to SSO, as if a user has either 
> MSA or AAD, most likely she or he will enter credentials at some moment, 
> and IDP will store persistent cookie. As a result, IDP still needs to 
> protect from a malicious web site, that is why all protocols that use 
> redirection has special handling for such cases, i.e. the IDP must redirect 
> on initially pre-registered for this client redirect URI 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6749#section-3.1.2 
>
> SSO itself reduces number of prompts, OS cookies are hardware crypto 
> protected and short-lived, while protection of web-cookies is lower. 
> Integration with OS SSO not just a convenience feature but increases users’ 
> security.
>
>  
>
> Thank you,
> Aleksandr
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/bc1fb9ba-2951-4d59-aec1-aed2e88fd584n%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to