Any update?

On Thursday, August 8, 2019 at 10:20:00 PM UTC+3 [email protected] wrote:

> LGTM. In the past Microsoft Edge has supported this for H.264 via ORTC and 
> really helped for conferencing scenarios especially on low end devices with 
> limited resources. Look forward to this!
>
>
> On Sunday, July 21, 2019 at 7:04:06 AM UTC-7, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
>>
>> Contact emails
>>
>> [email protected], [email protected] 
>>
>> Explainer
>>
>> None - the spec at https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-svc/ is pretty 
>> self explanatory.
>>
>> Design doc/Spec
>>
>> https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-svc/
>>
>>
>> The WEBRTC WG chairs have been asked about triggering the TAG review 
>> process.
>>
>> Summary
>>
>> Implement Scalable Video Coding (SVC) controls for WebRTC.
>>
>>
>> Motivation
>>
>> Many video codecs (VP8, VP9, AV1, H264-SVC) have modes that allow an 
>> encoder to send out video data in such a format that it's possible to strip 
>> out certain packets from the stream and reconstruct a lower quality video 
>> stream from the result. This makes providing video at differing qualities 
>> to multiple destinations for the same video stream easier, which is a Good 
>> Thing in conferencing scenarios.
>>
>> This extension allows a standard control surface for picking between 
>> possible SVC configurations.
>>
>> Risks
>>
>> Interoperability and Compatibility
>>
>> Describe the degree of interoperability and compatibility risk 
>> <https://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/dev/blink?pli=1#TOC-Policy-for-shipping-and-removing-web-platform-API-features>.
>>  
>> For a new feature, the main risk is that it fails to become an 
>> interoperable part of the web platform if other browsers do not implement 
>> it. For a removal, please review our principles of web compatibility 
>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RC-pBBvsazYfCNNUSkPqAVpSpNJ96U8trhNkfV0v9fk/edit>
>> .
>>
>> Edge: No signals, spec editor from Microsoft.
>>
>> Firefox: No signals.
>>
>> Safari: No signals.
>>
>> Web / Framework developers: Meetecho developers are positive.
>>
>>
>> Ergonomics
>>
>> This will be used by people using WebRTC RTCPeerConnection
>>
>> in videoconferencing scenarios.
>>
>> Activation
>>
>> This feature can't be polyfilled. Detecting the feature is easy.
>>
>> Debuggability
>>
>> No special considerations.
>>
>> We should consider showing video configuration in 
>> chrome://webrtc-internals, but this is not required for shipping.
>>
>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac, 
>> Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)?
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>>
>> Link to entry on the feature dashboard <https://www.chromestatus.com/>
>>
>>
>> https://www.chromestatus.com/feature/5769626174619648
>>
>>
>>
>> Requesting approval to ship?
>>
>> No.
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/7e40f9dc-223d-4260-a6a2-1880f2d4accfn%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to