I'm not sure I have guidance on how y'all can get more OT usage and 
feedback. It seems to me that y'all are best positioned to assess the 
developer need and reach out to them to increase engagement. Devrel folks 
may be able to help.

Without expectation for further engagement, I don't think it makes sense to 
continue to OT.

On Friday, December 3, 2021 at 8:29:47 AM UTC+1 Glen Robertson wrote:

> > What's the reason for the lack of sign-ups?
> I suspect it's just because it's quite a specialised API and the OT is 
> only available on CrOS.
> We've had a few developers express interest on the github repo 
> <https://github.com/WICG/handwriting-recognition/issues/21>. There 
> also seemed to be some interest on twitter 
> <https://twitter.com/ChromiumDev/status/1394365003675979777>, with several 
> tweets <https://twitter.com/search?q=%40tomayac%20handwriting> and a web.dev 
> article <https://web.dev/handwriting-recognition/> from our DevRel folk 
> about the API. So there has been a reasonable effort to get word out about 
> the API. 
>
> If you have any guidance for what to do in this sort of situation, please 
> let us know!
>
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 06:13, Yoav Weiss <yoav...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 6:16 AM Jiewei Qian <q...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi blink-dev,
>>>
>>> Our Handwriting Recognition API origin trial ends in M97. M98 branches 
>>> in a week.
>>>
>>> We want to get some recommendations on shipping vs continuing 
>>> experimenting.
>>>
>>> At the moment:
>>>
>>>    - 
>>>    
>>>    We have just 1 app using the origin trial (based on received 
>>>    feedback), so there is little risk of burn-in but also only a small 
>>> amount 
>>>    of feedback
>>>    - 
>>>       
>>>       Feedback from this developer has been positive
>>>       
>>>
>> The OT has been running for 7 milestones now. What's the reason for the 
>> lack of sign-ups?
>>  
>>
>>>
>>>    - 
>>>    
>>>    We have a draft spec in internal review
>>>    
>>>
>> This part sounds like it may need more work and broader reviews before 
>> shipping would be possible.
>>  
>>
>>>
>>>    - 
>>>    
>>>    WPT tests are internal, we can move relevant tests to external 
>>>    - 
>>>    
>>>    W3C TAG review <https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/591> 
>>>    suggests “the proposal is good to move forward”
>>>    - 
>>>    
>>>    We’re willing to ship in M98 if recommended, or
>>>    - 
>>>    
>>>    We're willing to extend the OT and try to get more developers to use 
>>>    it
>>>    
>>>
>>> What’s the recommended approach?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CANFkJJnCyuF0pP2UJLmxbabntRVTxXCGqFRM_-BpoUzg65-y1A%40mail.gmail.com
>>>  
>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CANFkJJnCyuF0pP2UJLmxbabntRVTxXCGqFRM_-BpoUzg65-y1A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/689f02f4-59c6-4b42-8c76-dc1bfae2b146n%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to