In that case, do you need 4 more milestones? We've set a cap of 9 milestones
<https://www.chromium.org/blink/origin-trials/running-an-origin-trial#:~:text=16%20weeks)%2C%20with%20a-,cap%20of%209%20milestones,-(~36%20weeks)%20absent>
for
OTs generally; this would bring y'all to 8. Do you need that entire period
if folks are actively experimenting now? If folks started testing in 97,
extending to 100 would give them 4 milestones to work with, which might be
enough?

-mike


On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 4:22 PM Hiroki Nakagawa <nhir...@chromium.org>
wrote:

> Hi Mike,
>
> We are aware that some sites are now running their experiments. In
> addition to that, another site has been preparing for the experiment. We
> are now actively helping them.
>
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 12:08 AM Mike West <mk...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> Was any site able to try this out during the initial experimental period?
>> Or is this really just a delayed start to the trial? I think it's
>> reasonable to extend out 4 additional milestones, but if you really didn't
>> see any usage at all, it might be reasonable to consider this as a new
>> starting date as opposed to an extension.
>>
>> -mike
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 1:45 PM Hiroki Nakagawa <nhir...@chromium.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Yoav,
>>> The requesting milestones are from M99 to M103 (The previous milestones
>>> were from M94 to M98).
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 6:02 PM Yoav Weiss <yoavwe...@chromium.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> What are the milestones for the continued experimentation?
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 2:12 AM Hiroki Nakagawa <nhir...@chromium.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Contact emails
>>>>>
>>>>> nhir...@chromium.org, navigation-...@chromium.org
>>>>>
>>>>> Explainer
>>>>>
>>>>> This feature:
>>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/admin/features/launch/5355965538893824/This%20feature:%20https://github.com/jeremyroman/alternate-loading-modes/blob/main/same-origin-explainer.md>
>>>>> https://github.com/WICG/nav-speculation/blob/main/same-origin-explainer.md
>>>>>
>>>>> This trial:
>>>>> https://github.com/WICG/nav-speculation/blob/main/same-origin-chrome-origin-trial.md
>>>>>
>>>>> Larger project:
>>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/admin/features/launch/5355965538893824/Larger%20project:%20https://github.com/jeremyroman/alternate-loading-modes/blob/main/README.md>
>>>>> https://github.com/WICG/nav-speculation/blob/main/README.md
>>>>>
>>>>> Specification
>>>>>
>>>>> https://wicg.github.io/nav-speculation/prerendering.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Design docs
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1P2VKCLpmnNm_cRAjUeE-bqLL0bslL_zKqiNeCzNom_w/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>
>>>>> Summary
>>>>>
>>>>> Prerendering loads a web page before it is needed, so that when the
>>>>> actual navigation to that page occurs, it can be shown instantly.
>>>>>
>>>>> This experiment is for the specific case of same-origin prerendering
>>>>> triggered by the Speculation Rules API. An earlier, related experiment
>>>>> supported prefetching
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/Cw-hOjT47qI/m/EObn9-4MAgAJ>
>>>>> using this API. This is a separate experiment that requires its own origin
>>>>> trial token.
>>>>>
>>>>> This experiment has some limitations. See the explainer
>>>>> <https://github.com/WICG/nav-speculation/blob/main/same-origin-chrome-origin-trial.md#speculation-rules>
>>>>> for details.
>>>>>
>>>>> Blink component
>>>>>
>>>>> Internals>Preload>Prerender
>>>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Internals%3EPreload%3EPrerender>
>>>>>
>>>>> TAG review
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/667
>>>>>
>>>>> TAG review status
>>>>>
>>>>> Pending
>>>>>
>>>>> Risks
>>>>>
>>>>> Interoperability and Compatibility
>>>>>
>>>>> Interoperability risk: We believe that some browsers already have
>>>>> prerendering implementations which are not well-specified and may differ
>>>>> from each other. Our vision is to produce a specification that can help
>>>>> improve interoperability. There is a risk that other browsers do not
>>>>> converge on a prerendering standard. The danger here is that different
>>>>> browsers have different ways to trigger a prerendered page, and 
>>>>> prerendered
>>>>> pages behave differently in different browsers.
>>>>>
>>>>> Prerendering is a web-visible behavior, since it involves fetching the
>>>>> page and executing its scripts.
>>>>>
>>>>> Prerendering can depend on UA-specific heuristics. For example, the
>>>>> browser might decide to act on a hint to prerender based on the system
>>>>> load, and the presence of other prerenders. We do not intend to codify
>>>>> heuristics in the specification. A conforming browser might simply ignore
>>>>> all hints to prerender a page.
>>>>>
>>>>> Compatibility risk: Some use cases will need to know whether a page is
>>>>> being prerendered. Ads and analytics are likely examples of this. This
>>>>> feature exposes `document.prerendering` to detect prerendering, but there
>>>>> is a risk of sites that would benefit from using the API, not using it. We
>>>>> believe that this risk is tractable because prerendering has existed in
>>>>> Chrome in the recent past and currently exists in some other browsers. We
>>>>> also intend to add a header to network requests like `Purpose: prefetch` 
>>>>> so
>>>>> that origin servers can identify requests for prerendered pages.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Gecko: No signal
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> WebKit: No signals, while Safari appears to have some form of
>>>>> prerendering already.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Web developers: No signals
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Other signals: No signals
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ergonomics
>>>>>
>>>>> This feature is triggered by the Speculation Rules API:
>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5740655424831488
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Activation
>>>>>
>>>>> Developers can use the Speculation Rules API to use the feature. The
>>>>> feature should just work for most existing pages. Developers should be
>>>>> aware of restrictions on prerendering content (they cannot play audio or
>>>>> perform other disruptive behavior, etc). This feature would benefit from
>>>>> good documentation.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Security
>>>>>
>>>>> This feature is the first use of the Multiple-Page Architecture, which
>>>>> is a significant change to Chromium's internals. Both MPArch and this
>>>>> feature in particular underwent significant security review. See the 
>>>>> design
>>>>> doc for more details.
>>>>>
>>>>> From a web-exposed perspective, the security and privacy concerns are
>>>>> smaller, because this feature is restricted to the same-origin case only.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Goals for experimentation
>>>>>
>>>>> To evaluate how the prerendering feature works on real sites before
>>>>> shipping it by default. This is a large feature and it's risky to ship
>>>>> without trying it first on real sites. We will be evaluating performance,
>>>>> stability, and correctness, and any other feedback the sites have when 
>>>>> they
>>>>> use this feature.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Reason this experiment is being extended
>>>>>
>>>>> The sites participating in this trial need more time to set up their
>>>>> services with the feature. We would like to collect more data from them 
>>>>> for
>>>>> evaluating the feature.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ongoing technical constraints
>>>>>
>>>>> None
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Debuggability
>>>>>
>>>>> Currently DevTools does not work for prerendered pages. On activation,
>>>>> DevTools must be closed and reopened in order to inspect the page. We have
>>>>> plans to add DevTools support for prerendering. A meta bug for this work 
>>>>> is
>>>>> at https://crbug.com/1217029.
>>>>>
>>>>> As a very small support, prerendered pages are visible in
>>>>> chrome://process-internals. Also final results of prerendering are shown 
>>>>> in
>>>>> chrome://histograms.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows,
>>>>> Mac, Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)?
>>>>>
>>>>> No
>>>>>
>>>>> This feature is only supported on Android at first. As the feature is
>>>>> a cross-cutting one, where almost all of Chrome's features must be
>>>>> potentially taught about prerendered pages, we are starting with a single
>>>>> platform and expanding later.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>>>> ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Partially tested. We’re now upstreaming wpt_internals/ tests (document
>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XqdlrYdPbLLEfJfjQE1IK0I5Elj_2uiGaK5aUGYc1CU/edit?usp=sharing>
>>>>> ).
>>>>>
>>>>> Flag name
>>>>>
>>>>> Prerender2
>>>>>
>>>>> Requires code in //chrome?
>>>>>
>>>>> False
>>>>>
>>>>> Tracking bug
>>>>>
>>>>> https://crbug.com/1126305
>>>>>
>>>>> Launch bug
>>>>>
>>>>> https://crbug.com/1167987
>>>>>
>>>>> Estimated milestones
>>>>>
>>>>> Previous experiment timeline: M94 to M98
>>>>>
>>>>> Requested extension timeline: M99 to M103
>>>>>
>>>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>>>>>
>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5355965538893824
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CABj5diM0QEn5hBg1r80PWFw6qpXhCVmC05p0qh5KT5h9xKh19Q%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CABj5diM0QEn5hBg1r80PWFw6qpXhCVmC05p0qh5KT5h9xKh19Q%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CABj5diNgh5%3DhSt_%3DAd1fKAC8ot8nqzpghFg_S58oih8mJDzhmQ%40mail.gmail.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CABj5diNgh5%3DhSt_%3DAd1fKAC8ot8nqzpghFg_S58oih8mJDzhmQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAKXHy%3DeqyQj4xpBD-40NU9hWAJ5258tJ9TK%3DPJABY4aKwiZPew%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to