LGTM3

On Fri, Apr 15, 2022, 18:20 Rouslan Solomakhin <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 9:44 AM Mike Taylor <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> On 4/15/22 12:31 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 4:45 PM Rouslan Solomakhin <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Contact emails
>>>
>>> [email protected], [email protected]
>>>
>>> Explainer
>>>
>>> https://github.com/WICG/digital-goods/blob/main/explainer.md#api-v21
>>>
>>> Specification
>>>
>>> https://wicg.github.io/digital-goods/
>>>
>>> Difference between 2.0 and 2.1
>>> <https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/WICG/digital-goods/45/392c2ce...rsolomakhin:3ebdec3.html>
>>>
>>> Design docs
>>>
>>> https://github.com/WICG/digital-goods/blob/master/explainer.md
>>>
>>>
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Jbt2Mzt-xg1cWVlFScBQsoX_pE8Kg1gYpulxUSV8FM0/edit
>>>
>>> Summary
>>>
>>> We would like to ship a non-breaking addition to the existing Digital
>>> Goods API. This change:
>>>
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Adds to DigitalGoodsService:
>>>    -
>>>
>>>       Promise<sequence<PurchaseDetails>> listPurchaseHistory();
>>>       -
>>>
>>>    Adds to ItemDetails:
>>>    -
>>>
>>>       ItemType type;
>>>       -
>>>
>>>       sequence<DOMString> iconUrls;
>>>       -
>>>
>>>       unsigned short introductoryPriceCycles;
>>>       -
>>>
>>>    Adds enum ItemType.
>>>
>>>
>>> Use of the new methods/fields will require developers to update
>>> supporting code in their apps, such as Android Browser Helper
>>> <https://github.com/GoogleChrome/android-browser-helper>.
>>>
>>
>> Am I correct to assume that if developers don't update their code,
>> nothing will break?
>>
>> AFAICT from reading the spec diff, these changes are purely additive.
>> LGTM2 assuming Rouslan can verify our understanding. :)
>>
>
> That is correct. If web developers do not update their code, nothing will
> break. Updating the supporting code is required only to access the new
> features.
>
>>
>>> Blink component
>>>
>>> Blink>Payments
>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3EPayments>
>>>
>>> Search tags
>>>
>>> payments <https://chromestatus.com/features#tags:payments>, billing
>>> <https://chromestatus.com/features#tags:billing>
>>>
>>> TAG review
>>>
>>> https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/571
>>>
>>> TAG review status
>>>
>>> TAG continues to think of DGAPI as a “product-specific API within one
>>> company.”
>>>
>>> Other issues addressed.
>>>
>>> Risks Interoperability and Compatibility
>>>
>>> Similar to Payment Request: this API is used to talk to specific store
>>> backends, and so its usage is tailored to the specific store. The reason
>>> it's a proposed web standard is so that the same code (which is specific to
>>> one store) is portable across browsers.
>>>
>>> Gecko: No signal (
>>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/349) Requested
>>> 2020-05-27
>>>
>>> WebKit: No signal (
>>> https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/2021-October/032001.html)
>>> Requested 2021-10-08
>>>
>>> Web developers: Positive (
>>> https://discourse.wicg.io/t/proposal-web-payments-digital-product-management-api/4350
>>> )
>>>
>>> Other signals: rouslan@ presented DGAPI at 2021 TPAC
>>> <https://www.w3.org/2021/Talks/rouslan-dgapi-20211028.pdf> (meeting
>>> notes <https://www.w3.org/2021/10/28-wpwg-minutes.html#t04>) and at a PWA
>>> Dev Sync
>>> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1a_6_QVEQrEeUduc8nPE-uc7PKCr-Yhx7/view>
>>> (meeting notes
>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1X2j1wKC2T4RONcUGYxGus8Dytv6s2_tVTUSkWDWPza4/edit#heading=h.chc35okxwb9>).
>>> Other browser implementers and app stores do not appear to have immediate
>>> plans to engage with DGAPI. There were some questions, no objections.
>>>
>>> Ergonomics
>>>
>>> Used in tandem with the Payment Request API.
>>>
>>> WebView Application Risks
>>>
>>> This API is disabled in WebView.
>>>
>>>
>>> Debuggability
>>>
>>> We have had several requests from developers to make the API easier to
>>> debug, but it is difficult due to the interaction with a backing service
>>> based in an app/store context. We are looking for suggestions (
>>> https://github.com/WICG/digital-goods/issues/33) on how we might
>>> improve the debuggability of the API.
>>>
>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>> ?
>>>
>>> The tests are in
>>> //third_party/blink/web_tests/wpt_internal/digital-goods.
>>>
>>> Flag name
>>>
>>> DigitalGoodsV2_1
>>>
>>> Requires code in //chrome?
>>>
>>> Yes
>>>
>>> Tracking bug
>>>
>>> https://crbug.com/1250604
>>>
>>> Launch bug
>>>
>>> https://crbug.com/1288420
>>>
>>> Estimated milestones
>>>
>>> We would like to ship DGAPI v2.1 in M102.
>>>
>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>>>
>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5339955595313152
>>>
>>> Links to previous Intent discussions
>>>
>>> Intent to prototype 1.0:
>>>
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/vkS3k30lWNs.
>>>
>>> Intent to experiment 1.0:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/syI9_M9dANY/m/3lt-QGMHAgAJ
>>> .
>>>
>>> Intent to continue experimenting 1.0:
>>>
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/uoTx_cRuL5o.
>>>
>>> Intent to experiment 2.0:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/wIYqo3F_Vmo/m/uKw6hDa8BgAJ
>>> .
>>>
>>> Intent to ship 2.0:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/2pjQ3O2GzDA/m/BqQ7UL6gAwAJ
>>>
>>> Intent to continue experimenting 2.0:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/DqnurOUBA9s/m/5H18GilKEQAJ
>>>
>>> Intent to prototype 2.1:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/JaNDPCUr1ws/m/JFt-E7ePAQAJ
>>>
>>>
>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAMMzaWGfB-SO4%2B0gz9h2Wi%3DKfi-i%2BTGbdK%3DJb3f8KCvxPR2Oow%40mail.gmail.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAMMzaWGfB-SO4%2B0gz9h2Wi%3DKfi-i%2BTGbdK%3DJb3f8KCvxPR2Oow%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfXm77Xw%3DJ7Ni0BEuqjyR63tdtf%2Bfj6YZYB5gwdrpRuQnA%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfXm77Xw%3DJ7Ni0BEuqjyR63tdtf%2Bfj6YZYB5gwdrpRuQnA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfUPTTzRam1gAcVnDgo-f2UMA%2B85KdKS0koq0m7CmtGmnw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to