Thanks!

On Tuesday, April 26, 2022 at 9:11:17 AM UTC-7 abe...@chromium.org wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 9:14 PM Jerilyn D. <d.je...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I just want to get confirmation for the following:
>> 1) Going forward, the User-Agent http header will continue to return 
>> information but just reduced information. This http header will not be 
>> dropped or suddenly return empty string or null data in the future.
>>
>
> That's correct
>  
>
>> 2) If we want more information, that is when we will need to use the new 
>> user-agent client hints http headers
>>
>
> That's correct
>  
>
>> 3) Going forward, the navigator.useragent js api will continue to return 
>> information but just reduced information. It will not be dropped or 
>> suddenly return empty string or null data in the future.
>>
>
> That's correct
>  
>
>> 4) Will the enterprise policy to disable user-agent reduction feature 
>> continue to work or will this eventually not be honored in future chrome 
>> versions (and which future chrome version) ?
>>
>
> For now, we don't have a termination date for the enterprise policy, so 
> you can expect it to work for the foreseeable future.  If we did decide to 
> end the enterprise policy of disabling UA reduction, we would give 
> enterprises plenty of notice and runway, but for now we have no plans to 
> remove this enterprise policy.
>  
>
>>
>> Thanks!
>> On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 2:51:22 PM UTC-7 abe...@chromium.org wrote:
>>
>>> Note: please see the “Experiment Timeline” section for our extension 
>>> request - the rest of the details are the same as before.
>>>
>>> Contact emails
>>>
>>> abe...@chromium.org, mike...@chromium.org
>>> Original I2E
>>>
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/R0xKm1B7qoQ/
>>>
>>> Explainer
>>>
>>> https://developer.chrome.com/blog/user-agent-reduction-origin-trial/ 
>>>
>>> Specification
>>>
>>> None, but we intend to specify the reduced UA in 
>>> https://compat.spec.whatwg.org/#ua-string-section as it ships.
>>>
>>> Summary
>>>
>>> We want to reduce the amount of information the User Agent string 
>>> exposes in HTTP requests as well as in navigator.userAgent, 
>>> navigator.appVersion, and navigator.platform. The browser's brand and 
>>> significant version, its desktop/mobile distinction and the platform it is 
>>> running on will continue to be sent.
>>>
>>> We would like to run an Origin Trial for sites to opt into the Reduced 
>>> User-Agent (and related navigator properties) to proactively test for 
>>> breakage. See below for more details.
>>>
>>> Design Doc
>>>
>>>
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1feIxK9S7oNgT2oGGebbxE9X0O-4wTKcsP_gRaY99tq4/edit#heading=h.2navvbygwxwb
>>>  
>>>
>>> Blink component
>>>
>>> Blink 
>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink>
>>>
>>> TAG review
>>>
>>> https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/640 
>>>
>>> TAG review status
>>>
>>> Closed as “Satisfied with concerns” (
>>> https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/640) 
>>>
>>> Risks: Interoperability and Compatibility
>>>
>>> The compatibility risk is low, as we’re planning to reduce the amount of 
>>> information in the UA string, rather than remove the header. Most existing 
>>> UA detection code should continue to work. It is only future UA detection 
>>> code that will need to move to use the UA client hints instead. In the long 
>>> term, we expect this change to improve compatibility, as UA detection based 
>>> on UA-CH is bound to be more reliable than the current status quo. We hope 
>>> this Origin Trial will help us flesh out site compat issues we can’t 
>>> predict a priori.
>>>
>>> As for interoperability, other vendors are on board with UA information 
>>> reduction, but not necessarily with the UA Client Hints mechanism that is 
>>> supposed to replace it. That can create a tricky situation, where 
>>> developers would need to rely on the User-Agent string for some browsers 
>>> and on UA-CH for others.
>>>
>>> Edge: Positive signals (
>>> https://twitter.com/_scottlow/status/1206831008261132289)
>>>
>>> Firefox: Public support for reducing UA string information - “freezing 
>>> the User Agent string without any client hints—seems worth-prototyping” 
>>> (from 
>>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/202#issuecomment-558294095
>>> )
>>>
>>> Safari: Shipped to some extent. Safari has attempted to completely 
>>> freeze the UA string 
>>> <https://twitter.com/rmondello/status/943545865204989953?lang=en> in 
>>> the past, but somewhat reverted that decision 
>>> <https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=182629#c6>. Nowadays, their UA 
>>> string seems mostly frozen, with updates only to the browser version.
>>>
>>> Web developers: Mixed signals. Some positive comments on Twitter, 
>>> blink-dev, etc., as well as some negative sentiment.
>>>
>>> Experiment Summary
>>>
>>> This experiment is going to be a bit different from a normal Origin 
>>> Trial; the goal is less about gathering information on the design of a new 
>>> API than it is about enabling developers and administrators to test and 
>>> ensure compatibility with our proposed changes. This change represents a 
>>> large compat challenge with very subtle pitfalls and vast dependencies, 
>>> it’s incredibly important we give developers any opportunity to test 
>>> systems at every level.
>>>
>>> As for engaging with the trial itself, there will be two components 
>>> controlled by the same Origin Trial: 
>>>
>>>    1. 
>>>    
>>>    Reducing the information in the associated JS getters, if the Origin 
>>>    Trial is enabled.
>>>    2. 
>>>    
>>>    A client hint that gets set when the Origin Trial is enabled, where 
>>>    the client hint indicates to the origin that the User-Agent request 
>>> header 
>>>    contains the reduced value. Because of the experimental nature of this 
>>>    client hint, a valid Origin Trial token must be sent in the response 
>>> header 
>>>    by the origin for the client hint to take effect or be stored (in order 
>>> to 
>>>    prevent platform burn-in for this temporary client hint token).
>>>    
>>>
>>> During the process of conducting the Origin Trial, we may find that we 
>>> need to request an exception to the per-site (and possibly global) limits 
>>> imposed by Origin Trials. In practice, Origin Trials rarely exceed their 
>>> quota limits, but if necessary, there is time between when the limits have 
>>> been exceeded and the Origin Trial is turned off, where we can work with 
>>> the users on reducing their usage and/or lifting the limits.
>>>
>>> Please see the design document 
>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1feIxK9S7oNgT2oGGebbxE9X0O-4wTKcsP_gRaY99tq4/edit#heading=h.2navvbygwxwb>
>>>  
>>> describing the experiment for more information.
>>>
>>> Experiment Goals
>>>
>>> The goal of this trial is to enable developers to test how reducing the 
>>> User-Agent request header and the related navigator getters will affect 
>>> their systems and make sure they have all of the tools they need for an 
>>> effective migration to User Agent Client Hints 
>>> <https://web.dev/migrate-to-ua-ch/>. We hope that by providing 
>>> sufficient time to test and provide feedback we can validate our current 
>>> plans for UA Reduction and safely roll them out to the web at large.
>>>
>>> We will be relying heavily on user and developer feedback to understand 
>>> where breakage occurs, or where use cases are not accounted for. We will 
>>> create a GitHub repository as well as a public mailing list for gathering 
>>> feedback. When the OT is ready, we plan to publish developer guidance on 
>>> how to enroll and provide feedback.
>>>
>>> Experiment Timeline
>>>
>>> M101-M103
>>>
>>> Reason this experiment is being extended
>>>
>>> We have a partner that would like to continue testing the fully reduced 
>>> UA string. Due to an issue in their experiment design, they weren't able to 
>>> launch the OT and collect any data. We would like to extend the OT by 3 
>>> milestones, if possible. We believe the risks for burn-in don't apply, 
>>> because this OT just enables what we hope will be the default behavior in 
>>> the future.
>>>
>>> We are encouraged by the fact that no other OT participants provided 
>>> negative feedback, or reports of site breakage, so we feel like this 
>>> extension is pretty safe.
>>>
>>> Draft spec: https://compat.spec.whatwg.org/#ua-string-section
>>>
>>> TAG review: Closed <https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/640> 
>>> as “Satisfied with concerns”
>>>
>>> bit.ly/blink-signals requests: Firefox and Safari have already shipped 
>>> UA reduction in varying forms.
>>>
>>> Outreach for feedback from the spec community: N/A
>>>
>>> WPT tests: There are WPTs covering general UA string behavior but 
>>> nothing specific to UA reduction yet (until the various phases land in the 
>>> stable channel).
>>>
>>> Experiment Risks
>>>
>>> Despite the proposed changes being net-positive in terms of privacy, 
>>> there are some compat risks, as many sites have come to rely on the shape 
>>> of the User-Agent header and related JS interfaces. Site breakage can take 
>>> many forms, both obvious and non-obvious. However, since sites are in 
>>> control of the Origin-Trial and Accept-CH headers, a site can quickly opt 
>>> out of the experiment when breakage is encountered.
>>>
>>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac, 
>>> Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)?
>>>
>>> No (All but WebView)
>>>
>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests 
>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>> ?
>>>
>>> Not yet.
>>>
>>> Flag name
>>>
>>> #reduce-user-agent
>>>
>>> Tracking bug
>>>
>>> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=955620
>>>
>>> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1222742
>>>
>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>>>
>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5704553745874944
>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/a9483f41-e174-4462-b8a4-65edf67ab0ean%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to