On Wednesday, 27 April 2022 at 8:14:05 pm UTC+10 Yoav Weiss wrote:
> Hey Alan! > > Our policy > <https://www.chromium.org/blink/launching-features/#step-3-optional-origin-trial> > > on Origin Trial extensions recently > <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-api-owners-discuss/c/Jzij3fKN5kA/m/Irt_B2DmCQAJ> > > changed, and we now require to see significant progress on various > shipping-related work before approving extensions (for 3 milestones at a > time). > Have y'all started working on a spec, signal requests > <https://bit.ly/blink-signals>, WPTs, etc? > > Since the policy change is recent, we may be able to provide affordances > (e.g. a 1 milestone extension) to enable you to catch up on such work if > you haven't done that yet. > Oof, wasn't expecting this. Thanks for the helpful links, I've reprioritised my immediate workload to have this spec progress happen sooner. The 1 milestone extension would be appreciated in the meantime. So far all I have is an explainer <https://github.com/WICG/sw-launch/blob/main/launch_handler.md>, positive dev feedback <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1t60YeQ-d-FSr9i91jvylW6sA7_R4jDnX1G4_PDfssYE/edit>, TAG approval <https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/683#issuecomment-1088481698> and crickets on a request for Mozilla position <https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/567>. I will spin up on getting a draft spec written (re-requesting a spec mentor as my existing one went on extended leave) and reach out for more feedback from the spec community. > > Aside: It seems like this thread was not picked up by our tooling due to > using the wrong title ("Request" rather than "Intent") and a mismatched > Chrome Status entry. > /cc +Jason Robbins <jrobb...@google.com> > My bad; the dangers of copy paste. D: I wasn't able to find a clean template on chromestatus.com but I might be holding the tool wrong. Corrected version: *Tracking bugs*https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1231886 https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1247817 *Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status* https://www.chromestatus.com/feature/5722383233056768 > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 5:18 AM 'Alan Cutter' via blink-dev < > blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > >> Contact emails >> >> alancut...@chromium.org >> >> Original I2E >> >> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/wNOClobsLrs >> >> Explainer >> >> https://github.com/WICG/sw-launch/blob/main/launch_handler.md >> >> Summary >> >> Adds a "launch_handler" app manifest member that enables web apps to >> customise their launch behaviour across all types of app launch triggers >> (start menu launch, link capture, share target, etc.). Example usage: { >> "name": "Example app", "start_url": "/index.html", "launch_handler": { >> "route_to": "existing-client-navigate" } } This will cause all launches >> of the Example app to focus an existing app window and navigate it (if it >> exists) instead of always launching a new app window. >> >> >> Blink component >> >> Blink>AppManifest >> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3EAppManifest> >> >> TAG review >> >> https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/683 >> >> TAG review status >> >> Closed. Satisfied to see this move ahead but keeping in mind >> compatibility with the MiniApp lifecycle >> <https://github.com/WICG/sw-launch/issues/52>. >> >> >> Risks:Interoperability and CompatibilityGecko: No signal >> <https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/567> >> Web developers: Strong positive signals on the previous Declarative Link >> Capturing origin trial >> <https://developer.chrome.com/origintrials/#/view_trial/4285175045443026945>, >> >> strong positive signals from the origin trial so far >> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1t60YeQ-d-FSr9i91jvylW6sA7_R4jDnX1G4_PDfssYE/edit#> >> . >> >> Experiment Summary >> >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1t60YeQ-d-FSr9i91jvylW6sA7_R4jDnX1G4_PDfssYE/edit?usp=sharing >> >> >> Experiment Goals >> >> - Test the new syntax with "existing_client_navigate" removed. >> >> - Give more opportunities to gather feedback on the "route_to": >> "existing-client-retain" behaviour that wasn't present in the DLC origin >> trial. >> >> >> Experiment Timeline >> >> Previous: M97 to M102. >> >> Requested: M103 to M108. >> >> Reason this experiment is being extended >> >> The shape of the API changed <https://github.com/WICG/sw-launch/pull/53> >> to address TAG feedback on default behaviours. >> >> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac, >> Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)? >> >> No, desktop only. >> >> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests >> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md> >> ? >> >> No, this requires browser_tests >> <https://source.chromium.org/search?q=class:WebAppLaunchHanderBrowserTest&ss=chromium> >> >> as it involves managing windows. >> > Have you tried testing this with TestDriver > <https://web-platform-tests.org/writing-tests/testdriver.html>? If that's > not possible, it may be interesting to file bugs to enable the missing > functionality. > Thanks for the pointer, this doesn't have the capabilities for testing this behaviour. I've filed https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/issues/33835 to see if they think it's viable. > >> Flag name >> >> chrome://flags/#enable-desktop-pwas-launch-handler >> >> kWebAppEnableLaunchHandler >> <https://source.chromium.org/chromium/chromium/src/+/main:third_party/blink/public/common/features.h;bpv=1;bpt=1;l=376?q=kWebAppEnableLaunchHandler&gsn=kWebAppEnableLaunchHandler&gs=kythe%3A%2F%2Fchromium.googlesource.com%2Fchromium%2Fsrc%3Flang%3Dc%252B%252B%3Fpath%3Dthird_party%2Fblink%2Fpublic%2Fcommon%2Ffeatures.h%23dBeGhIBrlUn9xqyup36XrW7qdqyxtZdxlPtCpwHSK7k> >> >> >> Tracking bug >> >> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=955620 >> >> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1222742 >> >> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status >> >> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5704553745874944 >> >> >> Previous blink-dev threads >> Intent to Prototype >> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/8tNe2jrJ78A> >> Intent to Experiment >> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/wNOClobsLrs> >> >> >> >> - Alan Cutter >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "blink-dev" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CANJJ2CkdQUQVvgo81PCPf%2BqpZ9VubW_c%2BVpB1nAoZz4u63Arfw%40mail.gmail.com >> >> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CANJJ2CkdQUQVvgo81PCPf%2BqpZ9VubW_c%2BVpB1nAoZz4u63Arfw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/52b0956a-736f-45ef-ae6e-4c1bb2e3fa83n%40chromium.org.
