LGTM3
/Daniel
On 2022-08-10 10:23, Manuel Rego Casasnovas wrote:
Thanks for the clarifications.
LGTM2
On 10/08/2022 04:44, Joonghun Park wrote:
Thank you for your LGTM, Yoav.
And thank you for the corrections for interop section in the chrome
status entry, Manuel.
I revised the section as you commented.
1. FF: changed the link
to https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1751024
<https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1751024>
2. Safari: changed it to 'In development'. The WebKit bug was assigned
to me, and I'm planning to unprefix the property for WebKit too via the bug.
3. Web Developers: changed it to 'No Signal', removing the unrelated link.
The unprefixing change for this I2S
is https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/3812328
<https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/3812328>,
and there are no difference between unprefixed and prefixed one, because
as you commented,
the prefixed one is just an alias of the unprefixed one.
2022년 8월 10일 (수) 오전 12:14, Manuel Rego Casasnovas <r...@igalia.com
<mailto:r...@igalia.com>>님이 작성:
Just an extra clarification, would the prefixed version be just an alias
of the unprefixed one, or are there any difference in behavior?
I've added some comments on the interop section inline.
On 09/08/2022 16:00, Joonghun Park wrote:
> Yes, this will ship the unprefixed version, not dropping -webkit-
> prefixed one too.
>
> 2022년 8월 9일 (화) 오후 9:20, Yoav Weiss <yoavwe...@chromium.org
<mailto:yoavwe...@chromium.org>
> <mailto:yoavwe...@chromium.org <mailto:yoavwe...@chromium.org>>>님
이 작성:
>
> Just to make sure I understand, this would ship the unprefixed
> version, but will not unship the prefixed one, correct?
>
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 4:18 PM Joonghun Park
<pjh0...@gmail.com <mailto:pjh0...@gmail.com>
> <mailto:pjh0...@gmail.com <mailto:pjh0...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
>
> Interoperability and Compatibility
>
>
>
> /Gecko/: Shipped/Shipping
> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1746187
<https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1746187>
> <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1746187
<https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1746187>>)
That's a link to the implementation, but it was shipped later in version
98: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1751024
<https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1751024>
> /WebKit/: Shipped/Shipping
> (https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=243670
<https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=243670>
> <https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=243670
<https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=243670>>)
This is just a bug report, so it's not shipping in WebKit. At least
not yet.
> /Web developers/: Positive
> (https://codepen.io/bramus/pen/XWegmqv
<https://codepen.io/bramus/pen/XWegmqv>
> <https://codepen.io/bramus/pen/XWegmqv
<https://codepen.io/bramus/pen/XWegmqv>>)
This is a page to check support, that's not something related to web
developers position. The comments on Mozilla bug show why this is
useful.
Cheers,
Rego
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/3bfeb500-efb6-58b9-e4d2-7cdc977d51fd%40gmail.com.
