I look forward to this. Will this include an implementation whereby the
visited links are only sent to the relevant
AgentSchedulingGroup/SiteInstanceGroup? My recollection is that the visited
link map was propagated to each renderer unconditionally.

Dave

On Wed, Jun 28, 2023, 3:21 AM Yoav Weiss <yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote:

> Amazing work that we should've done long ago. Thanks for taking this on!!
>
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 10:46 PM Kyra Seevers <kyraseev...@chromium.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Contact emails
>>
>> kyraseev...@chromium.org
>>
>> Explainer
>>
>> https://github.com/kyraseevers/Partitioning-visited-links-history
>>
>> Specification
>>
>> TBD
>>
>> Summary
>>
>> To eliminate user browsing history leaks, anchor elements will be styled
>> as :visited if and only if they have been visited from the same top-level
>> site and frame origin before. On the browser-side, this means that the
>> VisitedLinks hashtable will now be partitioned via "triple-keying", or by
>> storing the following for each visited link: <link URL, top-level site,
>> frame origin>. By only styling links that have been visited from this site
>> and frame before, the many side-channel attacks that have been developed to
>> obtain :visited links styling information will be obsolete, as they no
>> longer provide sites with new information about users.
>>
>> Blink component
>>
>> Blink>History>VisitedLinks
>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3EHistory%3EVisitedLinks>
>>
>> Motivation
>>
>> Since 2010, the number of side-channel attacks to leak the user’s
>> browsing history by abusing :visited links styling has grown, including user
>> interaction attacks, timing attacks, pixel color attacks, and process-level
>> attacks
>> <https://github.com/kyraseevers/Partitioning-visited-links-history#citations>.
>> While these attack vectors are slowed down by the 2010 mitigations
>> <https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/Privacy_and_the_:visited_selector>,
>> they are not eliminated; browsers are still actively leaking user browsing
>> history today.
>>
>> Triple-keyed history partitioning only styles links have been visited
>> from the same top-level site and frame origin before. As a result, the many
>> side-channel attacks that have been developed to obtain the global :visited
>> links state will now be obsolete, as they will no longer provide sites with
>> new information about users.
>>
>> This feature will improve user privacy and security. The resulting
>> implementation will be relevant to users who will see slight changes to
>> which links appear styled on their screens, and to bad actors who will no
>> longer be able to use side-channel attacks to reveal user browsing history.
>>
>> Initial public proposal
>>
>> https://github.com/WICG/proposals/issues/100
>>
>> Search tags
>>
>> visited links <https://chromestatus.com/features#tags:visited%20links>, 
>> :visited
>> selector <https://chromestatus.com/features#tags::visited%20selector>, 
>> partitioning
>> history <https://chromestatus.com/features#tags:partitioning%20history>
>>
>> TAG review
>>
>> TBD
>>
>> TAG review status
>>
>> Not Started
>>
>> Risks
>>
>> Interoperability and Compatibility
>>
>> Gecko: Positive initial signals from presentation at WebAppSec
>> <https://github.com/w3c/webappsec/blob/main/meetings/2023/2023-06-21-minutes.md>
>>
>> WebKit: Positive initial signals from presentation at WebAppSec
>> <https://github.com/w3c/webappsec/blob/main/meetings/2023/2023-06-21-minutes.md>
>>
>> Web developers: Feedback from UX that CSS extensibility is in-demand
>> from developers right now, and this work would pave the way for less
>> restricted CSS on anchor elements. In addition, support from various
>> developers who believe that taking care of this long-standing privacy leak
>> will allow their own security and privacy solutions to advance once history
>> sniffing is no longer an issue.
>>
>> Other signals: N/a
>>
>> WebView application risks
>>
>> No - this feature deals with platform-specific code, and Android WebView
>> does style :visited links based on user browsing history, but we do not
>> expect significant challenges for WebView users.
>>
>>
>> Debuggability
>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>> ?
>>
>> No
>>
>> Flag name
>>
>> (Tentatively) base::features::PartitionVisitedLinks
>>
>> Requires code in //chrome?
>>
>> False
>>
>> Tracking bug
>>
>> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1448609
>>
>> Launch bug
>>
>> https://launch.corp.google.com/launch/4259382
>>
>> Estimated milestones
>>
>> No milestones specified yet
>>
>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>>
>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5101991698628608
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CA%2BmmbXbbLWwmRYH5SWx0%2BMWkfB2UY2miOAq4r0MZc34i_sWqBw%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CA%2BmmbXbbLWwmRYH5SWx0%2BMWkfB2UY2miOAq4r0MZc34i_sWqBw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfUc0KFyXgQ0LMWQnj3AT363td0k1LJSgsZp8pXvCxPZ7A%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfUc0KFyXgQ0LMWQnj3AT363td0k1LJSgsZp8pXvCxPZ7A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAHgVhZXbH5Tp_Q6d-EVJMx45-Z35mY3bp9wQRtuHU1q9%2BK11Dg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to